Ideas
2,720 topics in this forum
-
- 1 follower
- 1 reply
- 278 views
Hello, We all know how colonization works for now in AoH3. I propose to bring more depth to this feature, because it still seems to be to OP and simple. Firstly to bring more depth, is when you colonize a province, there should be a form of resistance by the local population (tribes), before you control it. This would work like sieges, but with a risk of failed conquest according to the local population. Settlers should travel with the protection of units to make conquests successful, because settlers should be protected. The second point is the Colonial Act should be renamed to the Expansionary Act, due to the change that I will propose right now. The Expa…
Last reply by Wayne23lololh, -
-
- 1 reply
- 287 views
It would be so much more convenient if there was capitulation. Let's say I'm Russia and in a war with China. It's very time-consuming to capture every single province belonging to China, but if I occupy around 90% of China, they will surrender the rest of their territory and I will occupy it until a peace treaty is made. Doing this will make the game more realistic and more fun, as you don't have to spend the next 30 minutes trying to capture the rest of China.
Last reply by qxz, -
- 1 follower
- 8 replies
- 1.3k views
the extermination of the civilian population is supposed to work in such a way that, for example, there is a special option for extermination and after pressing the option, it would be possible to determine what nationality of people should be removed, this option would be useful both for the World War II scenario and to create a coherent single national state
Last reply by YouravaragebrazilianAoCfan, -
- 0 replies
- 159 views
how
Last reply by EdgeLord, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 232 views
𝐏𝐋𝐀𝐆𝐔𝐄𝐒 The Guy Who Read This,You Probably Know We Have Plagues In AohIII, We can Have More And Advanced Plagues for scenarios,it can effect soldiers,cost of farm/income,Also it can harm population more,with economy,we have plagues age by age. 𝐋𝐎𝐎𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆 We can make flags with animated by using gif,also make moving generals/leaders on country profile,when we open the menu we can hear their sound Also. 𝐀𝐃𝐕𝐀𝐍𝐂𝐄𝐃 𝐓𝐔𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐈𝐀𝐋 We can select different tutorials when we log in game first time. They can be Basic-Detailed-Advanced Also Auto skip and 1.25/1.5/2/0.5x speed for all tutorials. 𝐌𝐄𝐍𝐔 You can add a text for what added for game,more detail…
Last reply by AgeOfHistorySuggester2025, -
- 1 follower
- 9 replies
- 568 views
We Saw Portugal Literally Split Into Two Monarchies After A SUCCESFUL REBELLION THAT CAPTURED THE CAPITAL, which is unrealistic, so i suggest making it so that if a rebellion happens in the mainland and captures the capital/largest city after some time it is automatically successful and forms a democracy or a republic (post napoleonic wars ofc) also We saw in the video that portugese controlled emirates were 100% portugese christian yet when they were rebelled they formed the UAE, will there be a system that works to make it so that rebellions will form certain nations based on where they are? cus that sounds sick but it wouldnt make sense for the UAE t…
Last reply by Das Moss Man, -
- 1 follower
- 7 replies
- 966 views
Please add some kind of Description that appears on the country selection screen, similar to Victoria 3, so we can add lore and stuff to it!
Last reply by Mirolit, -
Trade between countries is necessary.
Last reply by korea, -
- 0 replies
- 292 views
the world with ww1 borders
Last reply by ww1 scenario, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 201 views
Hello, This topic is about creating colonies by default. The main reason to think about this is to avoid the recent flag for colonies. When an AI country colonizes from 5 provinces which are in another continent then the country will be automatically transferred into a newly established colony with its first colonized province as its capital, it could be changed by the colonizer. Establishing a colony option would be a new feature aside from releasing a vassal. It should be available when a country adopts the colonial law. Settlers and a mobilized army would still be directed by the colonizer, but its provinces colonized by th…
Last reply by Wayne23lololh, -
When we play against a country, other countries need to make progress as in history, instead of growing ridiculously.
Last reply by WeaseLL, -
- 0 replies
- 122 views
Please allow the country to be formed in this game as in Age of History 2.(castile-spain,turkey-ottoman)
Last reply by WeaseLL, -
- 2 replies
- 339 views
Hello Mr.Jakowski , I have a few suggestions about the game, I hope they will be useful. First of all, you can make sea mechanics inspired by Victoria 3. When two armies at war meet at sea on the route points of navy and merchant ships, war breaks out depending on the characteristics of the commanders. navy levels. Since there was no navy, transport ships were burned. Secondly, from the game. You should remove the Atomic Bomb Feature. This feature will not only spoil the fun of the game in Hoi4, but will also not be liked in this game. Thirdly, you can take inspiration from Crusader Kings3 for the provincial environments and buildings in the provinces in the game. I also …
Last reply by WeaseLL, -
- 0 replies
- 159 views
so you see how lukazs showed that instead of gaining one tile when attacking you gain the tiles next to the attack area too? well i suggest lukazs adds a setting called Slow combat: basically you only gain one tile when attacking so wars are longer pls adddddd
Last reply by Mike13533, -
- 1 reply
- 201 views
What if after the player's nation was conquered they can still continue to play.For example United Kingdom (Computer enemy) conquered South Africa (Player).Then the player has the option to incite nationalist ideas in the territories that was conquered by the enemy. A rebellion would happen that will be control by the player. The player task is to hold out and defend. Until the enemy either gave up or the player's rebellion gets decimated.
Last reply by YouravaragebrazilianAoCfan, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 214 views
defensive or offensive alliances against common enemies in Age of History 3. this will work as follows, if 2 countries A and B have bad relations with country C and also have a border with it/have a common border (between each other), then countries A and B, provided that their common economic potential is less than or equal to country C, will conclude a defensive alliance against country C. If If the total economic potential of countries A and B is greater than that of country C, then in this case they will conclude an offensive alliance and either immediately or as relations with country C deteriorate, they will enter into a military confrontation with it. Thus, we …
Last reply by mrx, -
- 1 follower
- 3 replies
- 254 views
Welcome! So, it's a small idea, which have a big potential for modding I propose a decision system, in this system it will be possible to make decisions; they can be either standard for each country or unique Why is this necessary if there are missions? Unlike a mission, decisions are more flexible and less important, decisions will differ from missions: 1)Possibility to use decision several times 2)Possibility to accept/cancel a decision 3)Opportunity to influence a country less significantly than through missions Decision conditions The main element for making a decision can be legacy points To make a dec…
Last reply by andry202222, -
- 0 replies
- 189 views
so i think that AOH3 needs a Mission or you may call it Focus tree, it would be a tree just like the tech tree just with little images like the events of EU4, it would be editable and use mechanics from events such as has_tech_level, is_at_war_with etc etc, they would be phenomenal especially in flavouring the game, so that if editable we can have gameplays that are more deep EX: we could create a mission tree to form germany as brandenburg. I am not saying Lukasz needs to do all nations but only request nations and major powers, thanks bye!
Last reply by andry202222, -
- 0 replies
- 199 views
More types of vassals should be implemented in to Age of History 3, because it would add more flavor to the game. You could use a type of system such as Hearts of Iron 4: Integrated vassal, vassal, colony, dominion, and then becoming free! I suggest that you add an autonomy system for this too. Thanks for reading! Inspired by the Hearts of Iron 4 autonomy system: https://hoi4.paradoxwikis.com/Puppet#Autonomy_system
Last reply by 26gbush, -
- 0 replies
- 121 views
Lukas. Oyunda gemiler olsunn mesela ağır gemi savaş gemisi modern gemi gibi ne dersin
Last reply by HUN İMPARATORLUĞU, -
- 2 followers
- 22 replies
- 1.3k views
i was bored so i did make this songs for age of history 2/3 the song are big to but in here so here is the link for album https://www.bandlab.com/djmaxcz/albums/ec5bb789-fc3e-ef11-86c3-0022484529f8
Last reply by zdislav, -
- 0 replies
- 193 views
Inspired by someone else's idea. Adding special features (permanent or by the player's decision/I) for some provinces, it can improve the gameplay and add realism. Examples: 1) In the provinces of tropical regions of Africa and Asia, there will be a feature of "Malaria", which will significantly reduce population growth and increase the cost of colonization if the capital is not located in these regions and if the technology that would allow circumventing this restriction has not been studied. 2) Regions like Japan and Anatolia receive the "Unstable Tectonics" feature in some provinces, which reduces economic growth and may have an earthquake event wit…
Last reply by Matvey, -
- 3 replies
- 314 views
These features would make the game more realistic and detailed without much development time cost: 1. Castes/classes. The population could be divided into three classes (upper, middle and poor). Technically, these are just additional numbers in the population panel, but the wealthier population pays more taxes. At the same time, the number of strata in each province and civilization as a whole depends on the population of the province (the upper class will be more numerous in large cities and metropolitan provinces), buildings built (the proportion of the upper and middle classes is higher in a well-developed province), laws and ideology adopted, etc. 2. Migrat…
Last reply by Mirolit, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 239 views
@Łukasz Jakowski, I think it’s better to make uprisings similar to wars, with a military score, at 100% of which the rebels declare independence, not suddenly in the middle of a war.
Last reply by NotYourBunnyWrote, -
- 0 replies
- 274 views
There are different opinions on the form regarding the improvement of the wagering of different political regimes. I believe that in order to better and easier reflect the issue of regime stability and the possibility of political change, we should make a "parliament" for all types of government. Explanation: any government, even the most dictatorial, relies on certain interest groups in the country. To simplify them, we will reduce them to "political parties". 1) Each country will have a parliament and a system of supposedly elections. The party that wins based on the results of its influence will determine the political course of the country (some modifi…
Last reply by Matvey,