Ideas
2,773 topics in this forum
-
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 706 views
1.Hiệp ước Hiệp ước là một thỏa thuận pháp lý quốc tế, được ký kết giữa các quốc gia hoặc các tổ chức quốc tế. Nội dung của hiệp ước rất đa dạng, từ các vấn đề chính trị, kinh tế, văn hóa, xã hội đến các vấn đề kỹ thuật. Phân loại các hiệp ước Có nhiều cách phân loại hiệp ước, tùy thuộc vào góc nhìn mà chúng được xem xét. Sau đây là một số phân loại phổ biến: Theo số lượng các bên tham gia Hiệp ước song phương: Giữa hai quốc gia. Hiệp ước đa phương: Giữa nhiều quốc gia. Theo nội dung Hiệp ước chính trị: Bao gồm các vấn đề như thiết lập quan hệ ngoại giao, giải quyết tranh chấp, hợp tác quốc phòng, v.v. Hiệp ước kinh tế: Liên q…
Last reply by khang, -
-
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 439 views
@Łukasz Jakowski Thanks for caring about the game after release. This ideas could be also released in nearest update with better provinces transfer and multiplayer(?). I know that all these features couldn't be added but who knows... Suport rebels Forgotten feature from AoH2. Would be glad to see it again in AoH3 and I'm sure that many peoples would agree with my opinion. I also think it could be made somehow with spies(spies could become more useful) Create own HRE type alliance(defensive alliance) during the game + option to join existing HRE alliance(defensive alliance). Why I couldn't join NATO for example? I think HRE alliances should be corrected…
Last reply by Casual, -
- 2 followers
- 2 replies
- 775 views
It feels weird seeing all the Chinese warlords in the Fall of the Han Dynasty scenario having ancient Greek hoplites in their starting armies. (and don't think about the Battle of Zhizhi, there's no way Lukasz is referencing that) I think modders would be overjoyed if we could add unique army units specifically for different civs or scenarios. Perhaps this could be done in a manner similar to adding custom mission trees for said scenarios. Now with civ-specific army units would come the issue of linking them to the tech tree, which itself is not civ-specific. We (the players who support this feature) would have to brainstorm a solution before Lukasz can add it. There…
Last reply by Ilovethisgame2, -
- 0 replies
- 274 views
This was originally supposed to be in the game, but I suppose that the developer forgot about this. Anyways, I'd like to present an idea for this game: Which that, depending on the group of the nation, like Chinese or Turks, have their own special-buildings and units. That'd be it, I guess?
Last reply by Popooy, -
- 2 followers
- 7 replies
- 1.1k views
The official version of the local editor will be released within a month after the release of the calendar three to be compatible with the calendar three, and it will not be released before that (thousands of lines of code are being refactored to support more editing functions and bug fixes, at least it cannot be completed before the National Day, but after completion, it can be edited and even automatically generated with a provincial link, and exported to a form that can be used directly, so stay tuned.) @Brianman@BurgerMan@ExistenceDaVitaReduxDev@Historyk@TheAngryProgressive@JurMax@bun_dha4@BigCrow@davidcalebe
Last reply by Historyk, -
- 0 replies
- 297 views
hi guys can someone please make a mod for the world of ice and fire with different scenario
Last reply by Abdulraheem1999, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 886 views
Czy mógłby Pan dodać opcję, dzięki której możemy ustalić maksymalną ilość armii? Pasowało by to do bardziej współczesnych scenariuszy . Chciałbym jeszcze zgłosić (chyba błąd) mianowicie chodzi mi o to, że gdy zaatakujemy jakieś państwo nawet gdy armia przeciwnika w nas wchodzi w polu bitwy jesteśmy ustawieni jako atakujący. Myślę, że AI w żadnym wypadku nie powinno atakować gracza bez generała i przewagi liczebnej.
Last reply by marszalek, -
- 0 replies
- 307 views
As above. Though it should somewhat be similar to of the Steam's Workshop.
Last reply by Popooy, -
- 0 replies
- 420 views
I noticed that due to the fact that when adding a new technology ID, the entire technology tree is rewritten, which makes it impossible to run 2 mods with technologies I propose to make it so that the technology IDs do not rewrite the entire technology tree, but only the technology IDs
Last reply by Fire Quickly, -
- 0 replies
- 448 views
Allow us to release completely custom civilisations as puppets into the game, created directly in the release a vassal interface. I can see that balancing could be an issue, but as long as it's a single player game, that shouldn't be a problem.
Last reply by Trashcycling, -
- 0 replies
- 525 views
In AoH 2, if a province has more than two cores it's possible to set how the population is distributed between the cores. In AoH 3, well... you can't. Every time you start a new game the distribution is randomized. With two cores, sometimes the share is almost 50/50, other times almost 55/45 or 60/40. Basically the idea is: Be possible to set the population distribution between the cores in the scenario editor of AoH 3 like it's possible in the previous game. Example below from the core editor of AoH 2:
Last reply by Iceman, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 298 views
heeeeeey lukasz. how d you think about idea to give steam keys to popular modmakers, who maked popular mods for aoh2?
Last reply by mycat, -
- 2 followers
- 6 replies
- 955 views
Last reply by Das Moss Man, -
.thumb.png.1070fa079c7536cdf4061cac82260db0.png)
- 7 followers
- 57 replies
- 6.5k views
Hello Guys! If you like these ideas, then comment and react to the post so that the probability that Lukasz will see it is higher and therefore the probability that features will be adopted from this list! So i bought Aoh3 and i think we really need these features : -VERY IMPORTANT : Better and more Editor options ingame (Because not everyone can mod or plays on pc.) - One click build in all provinces - Multiplayer? - Maybe a focus tree system? (A focus tree system like in hoi4 which you can edit in scenario editor for different nations) - Civ Editor : Options for Different Names und Flags for different Religions and Ideologies …
Last reply by Mega4oSS, -
I think if we win a siege, the lands we have conquered should have a slight population decline, and slight decrease in growth rate, for a certain time like 5 years. @Łukasz Jakowski
Last reply by Wronislaw, -
- 0 replies
- 273 views
Can you add the required technology as a condition for building a certain wonder? I think it's important
Last reply by Pnompenb, -
- 0 replies
- 896 views
Since Lukasz Jakowski made the game exclusively for ancient times, many mechanics, and not only, are not compatible with modern scenarios and not only. 1. I agree with the combat system, if you try, even from this combat system you can make a front line without mods, just if Lukasz slightly changes the behavior of the AI with the help of technology. So that the divisions can line up in a front. 2. Selling provinces, let's say I captured Poland for Germany and as history give Vilnius to Lithuania, and the east of the USSR, and in the tab there you will have to manually search for each province to give them. This is so inconvenient that it is better not to give them to anyo…
Last reply by Indepci, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 325 views
1. Flexible Combat System with Frontlines Concept: In the spirit of HoI4, create a dynamic front line system for modern periods. Implementation: Frontlines and Army Groups: Players can assign armies to the front, and they automatically line up along the enemy border, responding to changes in the enemy line. Tactical Orders: Add the ability to set tactical orders — such as "hold," "advance," or "retreat" — allowing for technology-dependent tactics by era. Strategic Fronts: Enable setting up fronts for large-scale operations, for example, along the border with an entire bloc of countries. 2. Province Transfer and …
Last reply by SamDerminji, -
- 1 follower
- 21 replies
- 2.9k views
Hello, We all know that vassals are now improved in AoH3, with the possibility to increase or decrease tribute and manpower, and whenever the vassal can declare war or can’t. But Łukasz, you could go further, by adding subjects. Subject is a larger term for vassals that could include other historical types. Some subjects must be seen as a government and others more like a special attribution. All will be present in the subject tab, but some would also represent the government. How each subject will work : Autonomy is an administrative division or internal territory of a sovereign state that has a degree of autonomy and self-g…
Last reply by YouravaragebrazilianAoCfan, -
- 1 follower
- 3 replies
- 915 views
There's some basic event outcomes from AoH2 that are missing in AoH3 for some reason White peace Leave alliance (regular alliance not special alliance) Free puppet Change civ opinion Also it would be nice to have event outcomes to end things like guarantees and non aggression pacts
Last reply by eNeXPii, -
- 1 reply
- 509 views
There should be a option to transfer state to vassals and an option to fully annex them after some time. Would be awesome aswell to have royal marriage and there for creating Personal Unions.
Last reply by MFFMCCTTS, -
- 2 replies
- 392 views
Just like how Age of History 2 has the Age of History 1 map, being able to play the Age of History 2 map in Age of History 3 would be cool. Could be added as a map. Plus would give mobile players the option to choose that map if they prefer it, since the smaller AOH3 map is not so different in terms of size.
Last reply by anonymous8, -
- 0 replies
- 286 views
Hey Lukasz, I'm presenting you my ideas for improvement for the ai of the game. I hope you like my ideas and will implement them. Best regards! The Ai should.... automatically break an alliance when under a specific opinion threshold with the targeted country. stop rivaling a country, if a specific positive opinion is reached. only rival a country, if the country has low opinion. only send gifts to countries that they have really high opinion with. only reduce the opinion of a country, if they have recently taken a province of them, had a war with them, are the rival of a rival, etc. I'll write more ideas, once I got them in my h…
Last reply by GuyNamedKortak, -
- 0 replies
- 286 views
I think it would be a cool Idea to make a system where a civilization can collapse in multiple ways. For instance, for larger empires instead of turning into dozens of smaller states It can do an Eastern / Western split that is commonly seen among historical empires in turmoil. Of course this shouldn't happen every single time as that would get old very quickly, but it would definitely be pretty cool to see some variation in how countries collapse. It would also be cool so see Parent and offspring nations, kind of like how Britain's colonization of America led to the United States, or how the dissolution of the Mongol Empire led to the Ilkhanate and various other hor…
Last reply by Zathriscm, -
- 1 follower
- 35 replies
- 3.3k views
Guys, I figured out how to replace the national spirits (you can see them when choosing a country, there are 3 pictures) with more interesting mechanics You can enter into the game (I have not yet figured out how to end them) the features of civilization, the country will have 3 features in the standard settings, but in the settings you can determine from 1-5. They can be viewed in the form of a board and by clicking on the flag. You can replace them with legacy points and money, but we won't get a bonus right away, and if we constantly change them, we'll get debuffs and riots will grow. There will be 7 categories of features: military, economic, administrativ…
Last reply by Денис Живков,
-
Recent Achievements
-
-
Posts