Ideas
2,774 topics in this forum
-
- 1 follower
- 9 replies
- 1.3k views
yall dont know how a publisher works apparently... paradox is not gonna own the game, its just gonna publish it under their name for bigger reach, chill down Publishers take a negotiated cut. They can assist if he wants to hire someone to help him. Hence we get more devs on the game Mostly up to him. Publisher would help but if he doesn't want to give up money on his passion project or keep it cheap. He may price the game higher if a Publisher gets involved. He can do what he wants In terms of the dlc worry: then dw Paradox makes DLC only for games from its own studios, not for 3rd-party games. To do this with AoH3, they first need to buy Lukasz (more preci…
Last reply by Shinayu, -
-
- 1 reply
- 503 views
It wouldn't be bad to have a migration system in the game if your country is very successful, not necessarily a great power but one that attracts people from other countries and has advantages like more manpower and also disadvantages, something similar to Victoria 2, that is not only migration from the neighbouring country to yours, that there is immigration by boat from other countries like the great European immigration to Argentina between 1800 and 1900 and not only by boats but also by foot migration.
Last reply by Thefernofrommars, -
- 1 follower
- 2 replies
- 442 views
@Łukasz Jakowski the website connection has for the longest time been not secure for some reason, this might discourage people from the community to stay here and engage, turning people away from aoh games, so i suggest MAYBE getting new servers or fixing the issue somehow I copied the URL thru many safety detectors for website to see if there is some reason for this label, but found nothing, so really it's a shame that the website gets labeled this was like some credit card stealer website when its just a community of passionate gamers
-
- 0 replies
- 375 views
You mentioned the possibility of the game being released this year, but it's been about 2 months since then, and I believe a lot has changed. If you are certain that it will be released this year, in which quarter of the year will it be released? Is there a possibility of it being released by the 2nd quarter, until August, or will it be released by the end of the year? You mentioned that there won't be an ultimatum, but can we create this ourselves with a few event-like or conditional events, or can you add this to the game? You said there won't be a navy, but have you added a visual animation for trade routes that has any effect in the game? …
Last reply by muhoaga, -
A great advantage of AoH 2 was its smooth gameplay. There weren't hundreds of repeating events happening every second. It really annoys me when something interrupts my game non stop. I believe that in AoH 3 events should appear as rarely as possible - those who don't like them won't have to be nervous, and those who like events will probably create their own anyway.
Last reply by Łukasz Jakowski, -
-
- 0 replies
- 309 views
Idea
Last reply by tyvvuhb, -
- 0 replies
- 451 views
I had this problem in AoH2 and I don't want it to continue in AoH3 In the 1900s, it still seems ridiculous to build castles for defence and I could not see anything like a defence line in the buildings perhaps after 1900, defence lines could be used instead of castles if lukasz has already said the answer or the specificity of this, please write below the post
Last reply by YusufAliDE, -
- 5 followers
- 111 replies
- 15.6k views
Does Age of History 3 need a publisher? What do you think?
Last reply by Łukasz Jakowski, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 571 views
With the introduction of resources in AOH3 railroads would be the form of transport for these resources. Also to speed up the transfer of armies. Railroads have been used for a very long time and are still used today. Please add railroads and trains. Doesn't have to be complex.
Last reply by Skvasnyak, -
- 2 replies
- 451 views
A big list of suggestions for the game, feel free to add some in the replies. 1. Peace treaties-(already pretty good), should be able to demilitarize provinces, reduce the army size of the enemy and pay/request war reparations. Another interesting idea is that of a goverment in exile. 2. Military- already amaizing but you could have more units for each era (ex: light/medium/heavy medieval linemen, knights, spearmen etc.) - add artilery and an actual air force based at airfields (planes should not be destroyed by non ranged units) -ships(optional) could be used especialy to distrupt trade routes …
Last reply by Nigga, -
- 1 follower
- 2 replies
- 1k views
What's the most annoying thing about paradox games? When you Ask any player, the answer will be clear: Blobbing, after a while, the map goes from hundreds of civilizations to just 7 larping the whole world, pretty much, It snowballs into an unrealistic and ugly experience with no challenge at all unlike real history where empires tended to implode as soon as they get too big or advanced, this system is non existent IN ANY AND EVERY paradox/grand strategy game (except for maybe CK3 but it sucks there too and doesn't fit AOH3) so, i came up with a solution to this big problem, THE IMPERIAL DOWNFALL SYSTEM! This system would guarantee that No civiliza…
Last reply by OwnM3Z0, -
- 0 replies
- 426 views
亲爱的卢卡斯，历史时代3会有世界新闻（每当玩家做出重大决定时触发，例如占领外国首都，宣布改革等，如HOI4）和国家出版物（影响人们的满意度和稳定等）吗？
Last reply by 桂圆甜不甜, -
- 1 follower
- 1 reply
- 433 views
The Idea Is, when two or more states are allied against one or more state and vice versa in a large scale conflict (ie atleast one of the civs is a great power) the offensive side will change their color to red and the defensive to blue on the map until the war ends, allowing a much easier way to see coalitions
Last reply by Thefernofrommars, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 565 views
The Idea Is that for each civ you can make a tree of who rules it via custom rulers and even the cause of no longer ruling (death, stepped down, revolt etc) allowing you to return them to rule in the case of revolt or stepping down, even having the ability to fill vacant spots with AI generated Leaders, This Could Allow for many fun mods that add entire historically accurate leadership for nations like france, the UK, Austria, Lithuania ETC ETC
Last reply by OwnM3Z0, -
- 0 replies
- 478 views
Each test and certificate has various prerequisites. AZ-104 On the off chance that this is a significant endeavor, make a point to peruse the requirements prior to going before. Nothing is more terrible than squandering months reading up for a test you can't take or finishing a test that won't assist you with getting a certificate! Our simple inquiry instruments are intended to assist you with tracking down significant data too and look for a wide range of tests. What Is The AZ-104 Zeroed in On? The AZ-104 or as it's likewise known, the Microsoft Purplish blue Executive, similar to all tests, there is a touch of opportunity on Microsoft's part to test a variety o…
Last reply by AZ104ExamDumps, -
- 0 replies
- 610 views
Dear Lukasz, age of history 3 will there be demilitarized zones (no troops can be recruited and no troops allowed in, like HOI4), and will there be neutral states?
Last reply by 桂圆甜不甜, -
- 2 followers
- 2 replies
- 679 views
A suggestion I'm starting to see more and more is the "add front lines from hoi4" suggestion. I am of the opinion that the suggestion on it's own is pretty bad, and I'll explain why, and give my version of the suggestion. The following is a TLDR on why I don't think it'd make sense. It doesn't make sense for 90% of AOH3's time-span. Front lines simply wouldn't be viable for most of a campaign anyway. If a front-line mechanic is used for the entire game, it may jeopardize the AI's difficulty. For example look at AOH2, the AI spreads itself incredibly thin early game making it incredibly easy. Now let me put my own spin on the suggestion that would…
Last reply by Thefernofrommars, -
- 0 replies
- 363 views
Since laws are related to technology, I think you can use laws this way: At the beginning of the game, each country has a law that affects the AI of that country so that during wars, they primarily strive for direct clashes with the enemy's army. When unlocking the "early tank" technology, new laws are unlocked: after changing this law, the AI of the country that changes this law, instead of looking for direct skirmishes, primarily seeks to occupy border provinces of enemy
Last reply by Rodak Polak, -
- 1 follower
- 1 reply
- 420 views
Треба, щоб одне місто захоплювали довго і було б цікаво
Last reply by OwnM3Z0, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 336 views
This Idea Proposes that certain laws will be available for certain religions And Ideologies, Below Is An Example For A Theocratic Muslim Civilization: (note that These Islamic Laws Will Only Appear/Be Available for Theocratic Countries with Islam As Their Official Religion) Church School Reforms Are Replaced With Madrasa's Instead (as madrasas were also a basic form of education in the islamic golden age) Monetary Policies Now Have Islamic Currency As An Option Of Law Taxation System Now Has Zakat And Jizya As A Law Option Judicial System Now Has Syariah (Sharia) Courts And Under Women's Right's You Could Have…
Last reply by OwnM3Z0, -
- 1 reply
- 391 views
Not sure if this has been suggested before, but I think AI should target nations that are within their formable. For example if poland is trying to reunite the polish-lithuanian commonwealth, then they will target nations like ukraine, belarus, and lithuania first.
Last reply by Thefernofrommars, -
- 0 replies
- 355 views
It would be good if during the war, recruiting units was only possible on our territory, but recruiting mercenaries should also be possible in occupied enemy territories
Last reply by Rodak Polak, -
- 1 follower
- 8 replies
- 1.2k views
Something that annoys me a lot is the annoying people in the comments on this forum asking for content that's already in another game. It's stupid and annoying, and will just make AOH3 less unique. AOH3 is a original independent project, if you want content from HOI4 or any other paraslop game, go play them. Stop demanding lukasz to add it. For example frontlines, which would make ZERO sense in the context of AOH3's gameplay has been suggested so much that it's just obnoxious. Or for another example people demanding a historical gamemode, which again doesn't make sense on a development level, lukasz would have to completely rework the idea of the scenario system …
Last reply by Irinevs, -
- 1 follower
- 3 replies
- 806 views
Instead of ideologies which doesnt make sense to implement as they are simply philosophies, government & economic systems should be implemented, and it should be possible to have a communist government (which is a one party state, communism is an economic system not a governmental one) with a capitalist economy (as in the case with china) Two types of systems Governmental and Economic (and Administrative, will make a seperate post for this) This is a simplified list and simplified effects. I will make another post for a more complex system with more detail and more effects, for if you want to implement a more in depth and complex system (which would be…
Last reply by Wayne23lololh, -
- 0 replies
- 473 views
Hello friends, I played aoh2 at the time, I know that aoh3 is going to be released and they are asking for ideas about it. Military bases came to my mind. We will ask other countries and if they want, we will establish them on any land. These will allow us to pass through that country without any military permission. We will be able to plant things like atomic bombs in that country. If another country attacks, our military base will fight against the country where we have placed a military base, and if we want, we will be able to enter that war and put our military base on it. We will join the war on the side of the country where we base ourselves... Can you correct me if…
Last reply by Melihesen,
