Ideas
2,761 topics in this forum
-
- 3 followers
- 4 replies
- 1k views
I propose a simple change so that in the editor or .json file you can change the name of the leader for the tag if something like that is not already there.
Last reply by dodoaltac, -
-
- 0 replies
- 360 views
Realize democracy/parliament mechanic in AOC3. Every democratic country has a parliament. Every 4/6/8 years (that can be changed in the laws section if the player party has more than 50% support or cancel it if >90% support) will be elections. If the player party or player coalition wins, he can change laws and rule the government. Special events can create new parties, boost party support, or downgrade party support. Player will have the ability to create a coalition. With each party, player can improve relations, give money, and do diplomatic actions to create a coalition. Ideologically closer party will have a good relationship and will be easier to create a c…
Last reply by theresgraf, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 377 views
I want that in the game, if you attacked a country, then you couldn't take all the provinces in one war. There are several ways to solve this, but the most realistic and best is aggressive expansion and coalitions. Note: the countries of the coalition are those who are afraid of their neighbor and unite with other countries. I.e., the countries in the coalition should most likely be bordering the aggressor country
Last reply by Renibuff, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 291 views
I suggest, of course, if you will do the majority on history, then I would like countries to have the original national provinces of other countries, which is why they have an endless reason for war on them. And migration is if everything is bad in your country that people will run away from it and neighboring countries can choose to let them in or not, for example, in some reforms to do this, if accepted, the population will increase faster but neighboring provinces will become national provinces of the country from which these migrants fled.
Last reply by Renibuff, -
- 3 replies
- 579 views
Hi, i am excited for Age of History 3 and i would find it very cool if you'd add a Multiplayer Mode.
Last reply by Outlawexperience, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 295 views
Battles will end in 4 ways depending on the outcome, either decisive victory (highest) great victory, defeat, and decisive defeat, each based on the casualties, army amounts etc, and the more extreme the result the greater the consequences, with decisive victories giving extra legacy points
Last reply by dodoaltac, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 482 views
@Łukasz Jakowski Pretty much, modern units will be able to move freely within their country or allies territory BUT their movements are very limited when it comes to their enemy territory as they can only attack bordering provinces, this will be exclusive to ww1 units and higher, and in modern periods countries will mobilize their borders before declaring War, alerting the player and allowing him to mobilize too before the war declaration, and to prevent bordergore like in aoh2 (cus they only attack bordering provinces) the ai will automatically retreat if the enemy attacks the rear and starts encircling them, and soldiers will surrender if encricled for too long, prevent…
Last reply by dodoaltac, -
- 1 follower
- 16 replies
- 1.5k views
Unlike the second part of the Age of History series, 3 should have a system for declaring war correctly.So that the enemy can understand what to do. Just like you have to understand what you're protecting. If the enemy controls the goal of the war, then a large additional % of the war score is added to him, just as if you control the goal of the war. And so my friend and I came up with goals for declaring wars. @IKayzerI 1. Conquest Casus Belli: Allows you to declare war to conquer provinces that you have a core on or provinces that belong to a nation you have a claim on. 2. Colonial Casus Belli: Used against colonial nations to seize their colonies …
Last reply by Денис Живков, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 379 views
The idea is about confederation. To make it simple, it is like all German states have the same color, and the most powerful country (let's says it's Prussia) led the confederation. So laws and reforms could be applied only for his state, and the possibility to recruit an army for every state of the confederation. So the army is in the name of German Confederation and not Prussia (this could be changed, but it is better that it stays like that or it will be too op). So any state who is part of it could leave the confederation. For federation, it could be unlocked by a law named, decentralized system. It could unlock some bonuses and only federal countries could unlock…
Last reply by Wayne23lololh, -
- 1 follower
- 3 replies
- 660 views
As we all know the game will have direct integration with Steam Workshop. This is great as it allows easy installations without worries of catching unwanted malware when downloading from third-party website, and ensures that only legitimate copies of the game can install modifications. However! When it comes to the configurations of the installed mods, there arises a problem. Steam does not offer a software which allows the user to manage the modifications which they installed. Many games workaround this issue by developing their own applications directly tied to the game which allows the player to manage their modifications, enabling only those modifications w…
Last reply by Денис Живков, -
- 3 replies
- 439 views
Create a menu for can change texture packs and create 5 or 3 and the community create more is only for the esthetic
Last reply by Денис Живков, -
- 1 reply
- 345 views
I think there should be different types of alliances: defensive alliance (in the game, its function is a non-aggression pact, but I think there should also be an option of a non-aggression pact between several countries, not just two. NATO could be an example) defensive alliance against one specific country (If you are attacked by a country other than the one mentioned in the alliance agreement, your ally will not help you) offensive alliance (directed against one specific country. In AoH2, its function was performed by the malfunctioning "create a coalition against" function in trade. An example is the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact) combined option (s…
Last reply by Денис Живков, -
- 1 follower
- 4 replies
- 607 views
@Łukasz Jakowski u said u wont add it because its too broken so here are suggestions on how to balance it, the idea is this: there is only one type of cores that move around and migrate, nomadic cores, the idea is that only certain civilization cores/peoples will be called nomadic and only for a short period of time with a limit and certain conditions, firstly they cannot migrate once but migrate in waves, very slowly but steadily increasing via birthrates and migration, as a ruler you will get an event at the start of each migration wave where you can either accept them or deny them which may cause a hefty relation decrease, nomadic migration has its pros and cons, its p…
Last reply by OwnM3Z0, -
Make a reforms with a similar system of the vic3 and this reforms angry the people but have a buff, for example You reform the slavery in USA but the rich people of the south start a revolt
Last reply by juanjo, -
-
- 1 reply
- 312 views
We're computers is the host
Last reply by qxz, -
With a time of ages your lider die it's simple
Last reply by qxz, -
-
- 0 replies
- 294 views
Hey bro, can you change the order of technology tree is VERY lineal. I need choose the technologies for example I only upgrade the military technology but I can't produce my new knight because I haven't this upgrade of the industry technology or separate the knight, cavalry, Archer and asedion machine in the military technology, more similar of the vic2 but all is connected, for example You can't research the Archer because you need the iron of the industry technology or wasn't research in this age and the obscurantist stay in the power or the Soviet spy rob my technology and you have a buff because this technology is research for other country or you need the a knight te…
Last reply by juanjo, -
- 5 replies
- 581 views
Hi Lukasz. A great thing to add is commerce based in strategic resources as a iron, wheat or furrs which would be needed for certain buildings (iron for armery, paper for libraries...）and that these resources could be a casus belii
-
- 1 follower
- 3 replies
- 2.4k views
Will the sandbox mod and cheats finally be revised and improved ? The base game sandbox was "meh" with not so much features other than unlimited money and movement points And also will there be more cheats ? The only cheats in aoh2 that were useful were "setarmy" and "technology" which won't even get you to tech 2.0
Last reply by Денис Живков, -
hey, for example, you can add the creation of a virus, that is, with a high level of technology, you can create viruses (if it’s not difficult, you can make a development branch and somewhere in the end zombies) and send them to other countries.
Last reply by Денис Живков, -
-
- 1 follower
- 5 replies
- 486 views
Could have an economic crisis system similar to disease. It could happen after a world scale war, and tensions . This could occur to civil wars (a new country appears)and revolutions (a new ideologies appears), and ideology change by election : like NSDAP in Germany in 1930's.
Last reply by Денис Живков, -
- 1 reply
- 344 views
It's not exactly a trade route but maybe its possible to a add province value points if province is located on trade routes. In the editor, everyone could choose and mark the provinces through which the trade route would pass (each scenario may have different trade routes or trade routes may not exist at all. Depending on what the player decides). In such provinces there could be a bonus to income. For each such province there may be +1 prestige So it wouldn't actually be trade, but provinces that can be selected in the editor, which have a bonus to income, but this bonus can be called "trade route bonus"
Last reply by Денис Живков, -
- 5 replies
- 2.1k views
Hello, I think it would be better to have a reason while declaring war on other nations etc. As this will be more realistic while playing if we declare war for no reason there should be consequences like getting less land area than you wanted or the possibility of the coalition at those provinces. This would be a great idea just like the peace treaties.
Last reply by Денис Живков, -
- 0 replies
- 392 views
unit_name: Hoplites unit_defence: 3 unit_attack: 2 unit_speed: 1.0 unit_available_at_civilization: sparta,athen (possible set more than one civilization special unit, by typing civilization tag) unit_unlock_technology: iron_armor (entering NON causes the unit to only be unlocked by an event and locked the same way)
Last reply by bizacjum, -
- 1 follower
- 1 reply
- 385 views
Im have a sugestion to add online multiplayer by serwers and local multiplayer (like in aoh2)
Last reply by Wayne23lololh,
-
Recent Achievements
-
-
Posts