Ideas
2,780 topics in this forum
-
- 1 reply
- 471 views
Hopefully we will be able to name our alliance before creating one in aoh3 instead of receiving a randomly assigned name what do you think lukas when u form/create a alliance with another country so for example if I want to create Nato or sowmthing in a modern scenario I'd be able to name it as that instead of receiving a randomly assigned alliance name when trying to create a alliance with other countries
Last reply by xox, -
-
- 0 replies
- 440 views
Defcon system for us when playing during cold War era
Last reply by xox, -
- 1 follower
- 24 replies
- 2.2k views
Hey hey hey, After some research, and Łukasz's topics about elections and law and reforms, I was thinking of changing the way of governments. To divide ideology, government type and government system. Firstly, government types would be in 3 categories : Republican Monarchical Non-aligned system of gov. Next, these government systems bring each variant : Republican : presidential, semi-presidential, parliamentary/federal , one party state. Monarchical : constitutional, semi-constitutional, absolute Non-aligned system of gov. : anarchism, oligarchic, despotism, provisional government, theocracy, tri…
Last reply by xox, -
- 2 replies
- 957 views
Yes, the addition of NFs and decisions could enrich the gameplay of Age of History 3. The addition of NFs The addition of NFs would make the game world more diverse and complex. NFs can participate in the game from a different perspective than states, providing players with new strategies and choices. Specifically, the following are possible: Increase the types of NFs In the current version of Age of History 3, NFs are simply classified into two types: "terrorists" and "rebels." However, in reality, there are many different ty…
Last reply by Ares I of Congo, -
- 1 follower
- 1 reply
- 1.2k views
I want Lukasz to add such a thing to the new Aoh3 that if the game has ABSOLUTELY any error, be it a map, mechanics or adding new things, even when loading the game, the game will not crash like in Aoh2, but simply throw the player into the main game menu without a complete crash. And at the same time, a console line opened where it said in English that the game does not work and refuses to work due to such and such an error. And for it to work, you need to fix some error. In my opinion, if future players who will create mods for Aoh3 will immediately find out about the error that needs to be corrected for the game to work, then I think mods for Aoh3 will be released more…
Last reply by Łukasz Jakowski, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 391 views
I think paramilitar organizations like Wagner should be added to the game and establishing a terrorist organization or creating special units should be added to the game, add this damn multiplayer and inflation and money value and other economic things And need ideologies like anarcho capitalism ancommunism Minarchism etc Add genocide mechanics And after game out uptades will come ? Like adding new mechanics and other things
Last reply by Fake god, -
- 2 replies
- 581 views
BATTEL SYSTEM : Total War Battles will have 2 options, one is a quick summary like Lukasz did The second is to directly control the battle if you choose You can control the battle directly or you can let the AI generals
Last reply by qxz, -
- 2 replies
- 534 views
I have an idea of adding of social structure of the population and adding advanced trading and economics. I think, that's Vic 2 trade and economic mechanics will fit the game.
Last reply by qxz, -
Может быть, когда начнется промышленная революция, появятся капиталисты, которые по возможности построят заводы, железные дороги, Corporations will be created, and the state will decide, for example, capitalists in a democracy could go to the polls, maybe it will be possible to create a corporate state
Last reply by Nikita123, -
- 1 reply
- 504 views
So sinai would be able to be split into 2 then properly
Last reply by xox, -
- 0 replies
- 360 views
The vassals could have a function beyond just being a buffer state, you could build things in them and invest in them too and close their markets and force them to buy from you, thus giving more utility to the vassals and could also have a way to increase and lower autonomy and also you can occupy territories without annexing and or you are at war
Last reply by kaylaneuchoa, -
- 1 reply
- 437 views
So there should be two different types of rebels: Peasant rebels and Armed Rebels Peasant rebels should be like how it is in the current game where they can't recruit units and also have a special unit called "peasent rebels" that are pretty weak while Armed Rebels can recruit units and trigger an event called civil war. They should also be different types of civil war like separatist wars, ideological wars, etc. Finnaly there should be an ability to play as rebels.
Last reply by thecarvalhogamer, -
- 1 reply
- 498 views
Earthquakes, Tsunamis, Vulcanic Eruptions;
Last reply by thecarvalhogamer, -
- 1 reply
- 1.2k views
I have a good Idea: the countries that are ranked through 1 to 10 or 1 to 7 have nuclear weapon this prevents from every country to have nuclear weapon. This the best option for Nuclear weapon Issue. Please this is great for the game.
Last reply by thecarvalhogamer, -
- 1 follower
- 2 replies
- 771 views
To have the opportunity to invest in other countries (by buying bonds or similar instruments with interest accruing to the treasury). To have the ability to send funds to a country or countries engaged in war, in support of one side to achieve victory or to exhaust another country. The ability to borrow money at interest (uncertain). Investing funds in vassals to increase their power and improve relations. Creating economic dependence and influence. Example: hoi4 - Millennium dawn: a Modern day mod
Last reply by thecarvalhogamer, -
- 2 replies
- 689 views
Let the rulers of countries have their own level of aggressiveness. It will influence the country’s foreign policy, namely, with high aggressiveness, the country will wage war more often and agree to a truce less often. If it is low, the country under this ruler will fight much less. Thus, when the ruler changes, the country will change its foreign policy.
Last reply by thecarvalhogamer, -
- 1 reply
- 460 views
hello Mr @Łukasz Jakowski I Would suggest one thing that would help add both depth and complexity to the new unit system: tiers unit tiers start at 1 (weakest) and end at 5 (strongest) a unit tier can be unlocked via high technology, with each tier getting more progessively better than the other, a unit tier distinguishes highly trained experts from new conscripts and will add a much needed realism to the game Example: Line Infantry (Tier 1) is much worse than line infantry (tier 4) and this will allow countries to have the upper hand in their respective period without fighting cavemen with rpgs and rifles, this would also make sense for the gunpowder er…
Last reply by thecarvalhogamer, -
- 2 replies
- 767 views
Hi Lucas, I'm offering a flag changing system. This can be implemented as a solution in the country menu by type of capital relocation or ideology change, where you can create a flag yourself or select ready-made flags. It would be very nice, I hope you will see this post. I immediately apologize for the errors in the text made using Google translator
Last reply by thecarvalhogamer, -
- 1 reply
- 419 views
I think it would be interesting to pass a law in your civilization where you could expel people depending on their culture or religion like what happened like what happened in Spain or in England to insure your civilization doesn't have a religious crisis or rebelling peoples who have just been conquered by you. I also think that it would be cool to put in your own missions for a civilization, for example on of England's Missions is to conquer France or Burgundy's mission is to expand its influence in western Europe. Could it also be possible to have an account on the game where it has all your saved scenarios? I also think plundering should be token more seriously so If …
Last reply by thecarvalhogamer, -
- 0 replies
- 409 views
They need to add this system where we can create vassals in our annexed provinces without peace treaty. But when we created a vassal, the vassal will be at war with our enemy.
Last reply by AbKutay, -
- 0 replies
- 364 views
What do you think about adding to AoH3 crime level in every country/in every province? If in our province or country crime rate will be high we will have negative investment value and smaller income from taxes In every country there are cities/regions where crime rate is higher so maybe we should have something like that in AoH3 also Maybe in 16th century we should have technology to develope "Police" that will decrease crime rate in our country
Last reply by Rodak Polak, -
- 3 replies
- 986 views
I Think the ability to have more control over character would add to the games elements from the ability to have kids view a family tree get married devolop personal skills and imprison banish and stuff opponens would be cool, Laws like in vic3 and eu4 should play a significant role too from consriciption to roles of women, slavery, economic (free trade, restricted & closed) To border police (closed open or restricted/controlled)
Last reply by Mr. Rufus, -
- 0 replies
- 382 views
City names should change Lukas it should be known as constanipole then change to Istanbul later, same thing with stalin/leningrad & alsp Germany Berlin gets renamed if Germany wins ww2 to Germania also hopefully Berlin is like 2 or like 4 provinces and same thing with the capital of austria so like it can be split yk incase needs to be for post ww2/cold War scenarios
Last reply by xox, -
- 0 replies
- 430 views
Can we please just make leader traits not be random and sent in advance? Can we also just have a succession we're there is an option to choose which leader of the country? I really don't think we need any of these timelines where there's just random leaders succeeding the civilization or even just make an event option when you change the leader you can choose which to change with? PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEASSSSSSSSE MANNNN I SWEARRR TO GOD
Last reply by Ares I of Congo, -
- 1 reply
- 457 views
It should be possible to invest in art and becoma a "patron of the art". The country that invest the most at continent (only one civilizated country in every continent can become the patron) to the art gets the title "patron of the art" and huge bonus to prestige (like Italy during renaissance). If it will be difficult to implement in the game, "art" can be added as resource and the biggest producer gest huge prestige bonus (maybe strange idea to add art to the resources but in my opionin it is even more strange not to add art to the game at all) There was cities like Milan or Florence where "resource of art" was impressive. The idea may need to be refined, but …
Last reply by Ares I of Congo,
