Suggestions

Guys, I came up with an idea of how to organize banks in the game They do not have a territory and from this they receive income from buildings Example the capital bank will have a bank headquarters building, it generates income, and for this income we can build buildings in countries The countries in which we built the building can tax them (we give away part of the income). The country can regulate the tax (up to 75 percent) and even ban our activities and nationalize the building) But the most interesting thing is that banks can offer loans to countries (with interest) Banks will have recruits themselves due to the fact that they will …

We desperately need a place to report piracy websites for lukasz to take action against, the moment the game goes up on steam it'll be flooded all over piracy websites, PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD give us a place where we can report these websites without others seeing our posts (so they don't get the game for free from there) WE NEED THIS, IT'S VERY EASY @Łukasz Jakowski if you won't be able to deal with the large amount of piracy websites atleast create this feature in the forums until you hire people/get people from the community to remove them on your behalf, otherwise you'll make very little considering the exchange rate between euro's and dollars

The videos show that some countries are vassals of one one country throughout the entire game. It's a bit strange. I would introduce something like this, that if a country is a vassal for 100 years continuously, after that time it declares independence (even if it has very good relations with its lord) It looks stupid when Transioxana is a vassal of Timurid for 500 years continuously

Lukasz, what do you think about add the PC map on the settings of the android version?

Could you add a system that adds landless wandering armies that spawn in random areas, that can be hired by a civilization with money or a resource, there could also be a rarity were some wandering armies can automatically attack a nations armies if they are near them like bandits.

I saw in Bwa's video that Mali was passing through areas without civilization occupying, lands that were not "colonized" It's cool to be able to pass through these areas, but my idea is that when passing through there, there could be a chance of the troops decreasing, insinuating that they died in the crossing, or even becoming slower (since these lands are not controlled, there would be no infrastructure and security) This way, the AI and the player would only pass through there when it was really necessary, as it would normally be better to take the "longer", but safer and faster route

It could be useful to have a button in the settings that made sure the player's armies are automatically pinged (or at least those with generals), and far more better than having to manually pin armies

It would be good if every mod that is created was rated by you @Łukasz Jakowski, and if you like it and consider it good, it should receive your accreditation and in a separate section here on the forum you could create a topic where you would post links to mods with your accreditation. I think that as a creator of the game you are best person to say whether a mod is good or not.

@Łukasz Jakowski You can make it so that players only conquer one province at a time, rather than three provinces at a time.

1. Corsica belonged to the kingdom of Vandals and Alans 2. There is a rather controversial point in Sicily: Although the island was formally Vandal, in fact, King Odoacer of Italy had control over most of it by agreement with King Gaiseric of the Vandals. So I consider it necessary to paint two thirds of the island from east to west in yellow

9:50 If the AI attacked with its armies, it could have won the war. The AI is not focused on sieges, it only attacks the player's units and it can't do it correctly. There are 10 days left for the game to be released. If the AI is fixed, many people will like it. I wish you good work.

Please make we able to disable them before playing in a scenario.

Hi @Łukasz JakowskiI think that occupying all provinces adjacent to the one that was sieged is a bit much, I know it's to counteract with how many provinces are going to be but I think for the early game at least that should be a unlockable upgrade down the road. Speaking of it is the mobile version which is gonna have less provinces going to have this type of siege system?

at the very start of each scenario while we're choosing our civilization i think we should 10000% get the ability to choose whether technology will be research based or era based how it'll work? very simple. in AOH3 there are multiple ages, the age of information, age of feudalism etc etc, well the technologies will be divided based on that, certain technologies like colonization will be researchable starting in the Age of discovery, this will make it so certain civilizations can still unlock tech trees before everyone else if they're more technologically advanced already while still stopping gunmen and nukes from being used in the 1700's like we saw in the 14…

You know. In AoH2 we can play on 2 countries, but there it isn't comfortable. Make move in one country and second move to another it's not good I think. How about you make a switcher. I mean: If player want he make necessary quantity moves in one contry and then, if player want, he make a necessary quantity moves on another country. What do uou think about it?

1. Claimant: This will limit the availability of the government to only one or few countries. Claimant_Tag: {ger} If set to false, this type of government doesn't require any claimants. Example A: German Reich, National Socialism { Name: "National Socialism", Extra_Tag: "z", GOV_GROUP_ID: 5, Claimant_Tag: {ger} SUBJECT_GOV: false SUBJECT_TYPE: false SUBJECT_LORD_GOV_Tag: false } 2. Dynamic Government names: This will add roleplay, without making it complicated. Dynamic statuses will vary according to economy, workforce and population size: HRE-German hierarchy C…

I love leaning about the Chinese warlord period so I would like to give some ideas on how to make it more historically accurate (I am assuming the June 1936 start date is the same otherwise I would have more revisions) 1. I believe Tunganistan should be added since it was a political entity at this time, separate from Xinjiang and the other Ma's, despite being apart of the "Ma Clique" Tungastan was much detached and would eventually be destroyed around October of 1937 by Xinjiang, the word "Ma" was not a family name but a name used by Muslims of the area, in this case Tunganistan was led by Ma Hushan, same really with Ninghai which was inderpendent from the other Ma …

it could be nice

It would be good to see the total deaths in the world during your game.

This was my original post, expressing disappointment with the war mechanics of AoH3. It was posted yesterday, and got a couple of replies today, and now all of a sudden I find that it has gotten deleted. What exactly is wrong with this post that would cause it to get deleted?

I have another idea. You can add that the type of fight as in crusader kings 3 In some territories, countries will have unique interactions and relationships This is how the Tatar-Mongol yoke can be realized, All Russian states are vassals of the horde The struggle will have phases Here is an example in this Russian struggle of three phases: 1 domination, 2 reconciliation, 3 thirst for freedom. The struggle can be completed by the country and it can end by itself Russian Russian states will treat the horde badly, but the horde will receive more money and soldiers from the Russians. As an example, the relationship between t…

Yay ig lol

Add civil wars whether in a future Update or dlc thx