Suggestions

at the very start of each scenario while we're choosing our civilization i think we should 10000% get the ability to choose whether technology will be research based or era based how it'll work? very simple. in AOH3 there are multiple ages, the age of information, age of feudalism etc etc, well the technologies will be divided based on that, certain technologies like colonization will be researchable starting in the Age of discovery, this will make it so certain civilizations can still unlock tech trees before everyone else if they're more technologically advanced already while still stopping gunmen and nukes from being used in the 1700's like we saw in the 14…

You know. In AoH2 we can play on 2 countries, but there it isn't comfortable. Make move in one country and second move to another it's not good I think. How about you make a switcher. I mean: If player want he make necessary quantity moves in one contry and then, if player want, he make a necessary quantity moves on another country. What do uou think about it?

1. Claimant: This will limit the availability of the government to only one or few countries. Claimant_Tag: {ger} If set to false, this type of government doesn't require any claimants. Example A: German Reich, National Socialism { Name: "National Socialism", Extra_Tag: "z", GOV_GROUP_ID: 5, Claimant_Tag: {ger} SUBJECT_GOV: false SUBJECT_TYPE: false SUBJECT_LORD_GOV_Tag: false } 2. Dynamic Government names: This will add roleplay, without making it complicated. Dynamic statuses will vary according to economy, workforce and population size: HRE-German hierarchy C…

I love leaning about the Chinese warlord period so I would like to give some ideas on how to make it more historically accurate (I am assuming the June 1936 start date is the same otherwise I would have more revisions) 1. I believe Tunganistan should be added since it was a political entity at this time, separate from Xinjiang and the other Ma's, despite being apart of the "Ma Clique" Tungastan was much detached and would eventually be destroyed around October of 1937 by Xinjiang, the word "Ma" was not a family name but a name used by Muslims of the area, in this case Tunganistan was led by Ma Hushan, same really with Ninghai which was inderpendent from the other Ma …

it could be nice

It would be good to see the total deaths in the world during your game.

This was my original post, expressing disappointment with the war mechanics of AoH3. It was posted yesterday, and got a couple of replies today, and now all of a sudden I find that it has gotten deleted. What exactly is wrong with this post that would cause it to get deleted?

I have another idea. You can add that the type of fight as in crusader kings 3 In some territories, countries will have unique interactions and relationships This is how the Tatar-Mongol yoke can be realized, All Russian states are vassals of the horde The struggle will have phases Here is an example in this Russian struggle of three phases: 1 domination, 2 reconciliation, 3 thirst for freedom. The struggle can be completed by the country and it can end by itself Russian Russian states will treat the horde badly, but the horde will receive more money and soldiers from the Russians. As an example, the relationship between t…

Yay ig lol

Add civil wars whether in a future Update or dlc thx

Or is there chance for it coming out later on in a future update or dlc? @Łukasz Jakowski

In Age of History 3 videos, images or PNGs of cities are shown, which have different shapes, but will they change depending on the era? I also suggest that when the capital is upgraded, it could have an image change, and at the same time, the infrastructure, which I believe exists, could be improved, and the shape of the city and buildings would change as well.

You know how in Age of History II. It takes one turn for the other country to respond to our alliance-request? In Age of History III. This should also be done whenever you want to call your vassals, or request alliance. A delay will make it more realistic..

Hey guys here i will talk about some ideas i think it will make the game better : 1/ adding a supply situation to the armies every army will have a stock of supplies enough for two months , if the two months pass you will have to resupply your army by sending them food from your kingdom resources or let them take it by force from your enemies land , if you don't resupply them in the first week they will take a hit in their moral , in the second week they will leave your army or worse they will rebel with their general , of course the supply situation only apply when you leave your land to the enemy land , and if you cross to your vassals land they will have to…

As you can see, the border between the Russian empire and the ottoman empire is wrong, russia had control over kars so showing it as ottoman is wrong Also, the ottomas held the city of Didymoteicho until 1915 when they gave it to Bulgaria, as stated in the treaty of Constantinople in 1913 "Bulgaria acknowledged Ottoman gains of Adrianople (mod. Edirne), Kırklareli and Didymoteicho and the surrounding territory. The Ottoman Empire ceded the port of Dedeagach (mod. Alexandroupoli) to Bulgaria."(Can't find a map of Bulgaria in 1914 but you can see the following Wikipedia pages: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulgarian–Ottoman_convention_(1915) and http…

The land would only be given to Belgium after ww1, before that it belonged to germany.

Hi! Looking at the last videos, I thought a lot about how to make nukes work better, in a more realistic way, so we don't have everyone nuking everyone when the tecnology is achieved. I thought a simple but effective way to make it works. Atomic doctrines - Tec tree First of all, we need a more sophisticated tec tree for nukes, not for add more atomic weapons types, but to update how we use them. I thought at something like this: FIRST STRIKE DOCTRINE > TACTICAL BOMBING DOCTRINE > ASSURED DESTRUCTION DOCTRINE I am going to explain them. First Strike Doctrine: If at war with another nuclear power, it will use immediately the atomic weapon…

Last year i made a post on my old account @dodoaltac about a historical AI mod that i wanted to do using events and missions, well today im proud to announce that IT'S IN THE WORKS Originally the mod was gonna start in the year 1200 AD, but since that's not an available start date in the current scenario's, the mod will likely start off from 1070 or the 1300's scenario, but the most probable path is the 1300's scenario with an extension that starts at 1070 once everything is done Here's the phases that the mod will likely go through 1300's start date to 1440 AD - this will be the first phase of the mod, in which i'll start messing around with…

i saw the new video and, when you decleared war on Serbia, you could see their army. i suggest you make it that it would show 15k-25k instead of showing 20k (their army), so you dont know how powerfull they are.

UPD: I will do that mod by himself

Hi when u Open menus it makes a special Sound effect countries get also different colored menus based on their religion/culture for exmaple: Further more islamic countries get green Buttons and ui While Christian yellow Jewish blue Buddhist differenr shade of yellow Hindu Orange Shinto red Athiesm black Jain white Stuff like that @Łukasz Jakowski Its like how ck2 adds flavour unlikes ck3 for example

In the game screenshots of modern era/ww2 scenarios in aoh3, I've noticed that the population icon is still the same one as medieval ages, it would be better if there was a different icon for modern eras where the pop icon has a more modern outfit. and maybe a more modern pop icon would start appearing by the victorian era (1830)

Like the title of the post says, I just wanted to ask for more accurate provinces if possible! I'm using WW2 ones as examples and some I'd be really happy for but I'm sure there are many others. I thing it would be great if the provinces looked more historically accurate if possible. Either way I'm glad Lukasz is making this game and I of course I won't mind if every single province is 100% accurate. Wish you the best and keep up the good work! Also remember to take breaks whenever you need!

@Łukasz JakowskiTibet in 1836 was of the Qing Dynasty, and there are errors in the territory of the Qing Dynasty and the Russia Empire, so I will show you the territory Southern Tibet after 1903 was British India, after 1846 Aksai Chin was British India, and after 1962 it was Chinese.Taiwan belonged to Japan after the Treaty of Shimonoseki and to the Democratic Progressive Party of China after 1949. Can you give me a picture of China in 1914? Thank you!