Suggestions

I'm sure u have recived this suggestion before its self explanatory simply different war types like holy & ones based on territorial/province claims

we can release many vassals in the game and have a huge military power thanks to the vassals this one should get a debuff its so op

Eminim oyunu mobil bir platformda oynayacak olan ve harici klavye ve fare kullanan bazı oyuncular vardır. Klavye işlevlerinin mobil cihazlarda da çalışması iyi olurdu.

Unlike Bön, the native religion of tibet which is basically a older version od tibetan buddhism altho being distinct and having older beleifs from before it hence ig overall can be considered tibetan buddhism then, if u wish not to add it anyways the case for mormons is different Cuz they r a major part spread across atleast 3 us states since the 1800s and also since they are their own sect hence wouldn't.make sense if they aren't added images/proof down below

Please tell me so I can think of new ideas and suggestions for a specfic mechnic or part of the game

Hi maybe a simple caste system for certian Indian dynasties/rulers can be implemented whether it be random or anything and it can have certian debuffs and buffs Very simple/easy to implement hopefully

To represent western usa thx

Countries or religion like tengri should have the mechnic that if it's at peace for too long it starts having debuffs/pumishmenets/losses Maybe this can be applied to certian ideologies like national socialism too so it can drive the continuous quest for war for resources,land etc whatever the reason constant war while peace for too long starts having negative conquences whether it's lower happiness or any other factor which decreases This can be applied to tengri/horder deology and maybe nat soc as for other ideologies or religions not sure lol it's a simple/easy to implement mechnic hopefully! @Łukasz Jakowskiwhat do u think

The way nuclear weapons are currently implemented seems to be mostly focused on their use as tactical weapons. I believe that with a few additions and changes AOC III could somewhat realistically simulate a full scale nuclear war and be the first grand strategy game to do so. Increasing the amount of targets per province: This is the least important change but would add more depth to the game and would allow for multiple nukes to be dropped on a single province at the same time, thereby increasing the total practical amount of nukes a nation needs to a more historical level. Instead of the option to just nuke the province and damage everything more or less equall…

It's time to put on your armor and saddle your stallion, because the Vicar of Christ himself has declared that all who help drive out the infidels from the Holy Land will be granted absolution! When the Pope decides that the time has come for a new Crusade, he asks all Catholics in the world for help. After this, you can get to the Command Window by clicking on the Crusade banner under your portrait. In the Crusade Window (hereinafter referred to as the CP) you can access a bunch of useful information, as well as take actions that will help the Crusade or change its course. You'll be able to see the recipient the Pope suggests (if there is one) in the top …

Dear @Łukasz Jakowski In AOH2, peace negotiation give us 2 options to take province those are choose every single one and take all. So it would be better if AOH3 give us more options such as take all provinces but in specific region or continent. Example beside take every single one and take all, we can take all provinces in South East Asia (region)/ Asia (continent) if enemy has

1. Folk (whether u want to separate it into veitnmaese and Chinese or add a religion called folk/tradinaol beleifs is ur choice but either way it's nessercy) 2. Bon 3. Zunism (Also u xna also add if u want specfic islamic smaller denominations across history like druze (the suwaida province & golan province should be either druze specificaly or shia if u wish not to add druze) qaramatians & alwaites (should be religon in latakia Syrian coast if u eish not to add it then simply put that area as shia ) aswell as other forms of polythiesm & other smaller impactful religions like manchism if u want But.either way the main purpose of this…

Hello my people, and if I'm lucky Lukasz (Wukash). Today I'll be talking about leader death dates, and succession. Starting with, death date: As you know aoh2 did not have death dates, which led to things like Harald Bluetooth being able to be in power of Denmark. Death dates would solve this by putting an exact date when they died. Making an exact period where they can rule. There could also be a menu where you could see a countries leader tree like: [king I] > [king II] > [president name] > [dictator name] Second, dates of when they came to power and dates of when that power ends: This idea is pretty simple dates of when rulers came to power and when that …

which it can make small econmic bonuses for nations or provinces which it passes thru (there would be a trade route map mode that shows the silk road route thru provinces), and just like in ck2 it can be impacted by the condition of china/east asia in general and overall a small yet mechanic that lasts until the rise of ottomans or so where the silk road basically breaks down/ceases to exit 🙂 what do u think @Łukasz Jakowski also in the mobile version we knwo that it will have lesser provinces so i hope the holy land area has more provinces for exmaple gaza yk

1 & 2. Vietnamese folk/trad belifs/religions Chinese folk (If u don't want to create multiple folk/tradinaol religions then ig u can just create a in general religion called folk/tradinaol) this is needed for a place like veitnam since no other religon In game is a ingeneral folk or specficly called vientamese folk or simply folk/tradinal beleifs Chinese specfiallly or veitnmaese will solve the issue of vietnma since vieta has its own unique belifs ig which can't be assigned polythmesm or paganism so.either make a vietnamese.folk or ingeneral religion called folk/tradinaol religion and asign it to there 3. Zunism (won't attack a logo for it since its …

Hello, I posted this in question, but it won't fit in, so I will post here. But first, Alliance should be renamed Organization. New features: Here, I propose several features that could be added when we create an alliance. All of this could be turned off. 1. The option to "control" the moves of the allies army, without the possibility to mobilize them. It means that countries which are in the same alliance with military goals, can make the player control allies' army movements. Allies mobilize its army freely.It will be possible only if the player's civilization is in "Alliance wars" (WW1, WW2, etc...) and is a great power. 2. Then, the option to …

Hello my vassals and (low level) lords, today we're talking about drafts and mutinies. Now I hope you enjoy this topic, now let us begin. Drafts: In AOH2, we only had conscription but that required money. So I introduce drafts. Drafts will not require gold but there will be cost. -15 happiness, -20 stability, (Łukasz please add leader animosity I beg you) +37 leader animosity. So yeah your people may hate you, but I know better. And thats not gonna stop you. So to not make this horribly OP. The divisions made the drafted men will have a health and damage debuff. Cause they're untrained young 18 year old boys. Mutinies: Your troops are demoralized, happ…

Hello, Before I start, I announce credits to @Das Moss Man for his topic Royal houses and intermarriage. Today, I'm gonna introduce the idea of personal union and dynasties/houses. Personal Union This time, it would be more utilized than just a type of subject in which two kingdoms have the same king. A personal union is a relationship between two or more political entities that are considered separate sovereign states, they will have separate councils, however the head of state is the same. In law, it is not a real union of territories. How to establish a personal union There will be for now two options to create a personal union. The first op…

https://aoh3trtranslation.wordpress.com i cant send txt files so i put it in this site sorry if there is missing ones like yes = evet no = hayır or just sorry for that last one that didnt fit, you can just look from google translate by copy paste it to translation (English to Turkish) :Z

Hello, I wanted to say that in my opinion removing the unions doesn't make sense, and that they should return improved. I think this because there is Poland and Lithuania on the 1440 map, and in real life these 2 countries unite later, and in the game all this is represented except that it is impossible to create the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth like in the second game because the "Create a union" option has been removed. So I think this option should return. But to avoid it being an exploit like in the second game, where I could simply take a weak country and unite with a strong one, making my gameplay easier, the following could be done: this …

Lukaz, please add danube river like how you added the nile we need that

Now this does not have to be a part of the game on release, however it could make for a good update. Getting to marry and have heirs would be kinda good and make this game a worthy competitor to ck3 for only a fraction of the cost

1) Make it possible to change the flag during the game (via a file or flag editor) 2) Make it possible to change the country during the game.

I think in aoh3, the way to change a countries goverment should be different. I have 2 ideas in mind for how the goverment types might be changed: 1. Completing missions or focuses that lead to the goverment changing For example: To become democratic, you'd need to complete several reforms. A country might need to start of by establishing voting systems, then allowing for other political parties to form, and then finally implementing a constitution. 2. Elections This is the better idea of the three as it would make the game more realistic. You could allow for a certain party to form via an event and then hold an election.