Suggestions

Welcome! So, it's a small idea, which have a big potential for modding I propose a decision system, in this system it will be possible to make decisions; they can be either standard for each country or unique Why is this necessary if there are missions? Unlike a mission, decisions are more flexible and less important, decisions will differ from missions: 1)Possibility to use decision several times 2)Possibility to accept/cancel a decision 3)Opportunity to influence a country less significantly than through missions Decision conditions The main element for making a decision can be legacy points To make a dec…

so i think that AOH3 needs a Mission or you may call it Focus tree, it would be a tree just like the tech tree just with little images like the events of EU4, it would be editable and use mechanics from events such as has_tech_level, is_at_war_with etc etc, they would be phenomenal especially in flavouring the game, so that if editable we can have gameplays that are more deep EX: we could create a mission tree to form germany as brandenburg. I am not saying Lukasz needs to do all nations but only request nations and major powers, thanks bye!

More types of vassals should be implemented in to Age of History 3, because it would add more flavor to the game. You could use a type of system such as Hearts of Iron 4: Integrated vassal, vassal, colony, dominion, and then becoming free! I suggest that you add an autonomy system for this too. Thanks for reading! Inspired by the Hearts of Iron 4 autonomy system: https://hoi4.paradoxwikis.com/Puppet#Autonomy_system

Lukas. Oyunda gemiler olsunn mesela ağır gemi savaş gemisi modern gemi gibi ne dersin

i was bored so i did make this songs for age of history 2/3 the song are big to but in here so here is the link for album https://www.bandlab.com/djmaxcz/albums/ec5bb789-fc3e-ef11-86c3-0022484529f8

Inspired by someone else's idea. Adding special features (permanent or by the player's decision/I) for some provinces, it can improve the gameplay and add realism. Examples: 1) In the provinces of tropical regions of Africa and Asia, there will be a feature of "Malaria", which will significantly reduce population growth and increase the cost of colonization if the capital is not located in these regions and if the technology that would allow circumventing this restriction has not been studied. 2) Regions like Japan and Anatolia receive the "Unstable Tectonics" feature in some provinces, which reduces economic growth and may have an earthquake event wit…

These features would make the game more realistic and detailed without much development time cost: 1. Castes/classes. The population could be divided into three classes (upper, middle and poor). Technically, these are just additional numbers in the population panel, but the wealthier population pays more taxes. At the same time, the number of strata in each province and civilization as a whole depends on the population of the province (the upper class will be more numerous in large cities and metropolitan provinces), buildings built (the proportion of the upper and middle classes is higher in a well-developed province), laws and ideology adopted, etc. 2. Migrat…

@Łukasz Jakowski, I think it’s better to make uprisings similar to wars, with a military score, at 100% of which the rebels declare independence, not suddenly in the middle of a war.

There are different opinions on the form regarding the improvement of the wagering of different political regimes. I believe that in order to better and easier reflect the issue of regime stability and the possibility of political change, we should make a "parliament" for all types of government. Explanation: any government, even the most dictatorial, relies on certain interest groups in the country. To simplify them, we will reduce them to "political parties". 1) Each country will have a parliament and a system of supposedly elections. The party that wins based on the results of its influence will determine the political course of the country (some modifi…

i. If the war between the bots was hard and exhausted the forces of both countries, then peace is concluded for a long time from 10+ years. II. The player can violate the peace treaty and declare war, in contrast to this, attacker army will have lowered morale, and the attacked one has higher morale III. Hordes are raiding states with -15-100 relations (Without declaring war) IV. I also suggest adding the depletion of the army after the capture of several castles. (For example, the Turks attacked Hungary, but after taking several castles, their Army weakened) V. Bots don't attack a country that is stronger than him. During a war, a weak country defends…

It would be good to see guerrillas, mafia and/or organized crime groups, like the mechanics presented in HoI4, for example, the mechanics of the Italian mafia in Italy, could be put on the map of the modern world, using groups as examples. organized as: FARC, ISIS, ETA, ELN, etc. Or also, instead of organized groups, there could be independent movements.

Sería interesante ver que cuando se cambia la forma de gobierno hay una disminución de la estabilidad y la felicidad , simulando que la gente no quiere estar en ese tipo de gobierno, o tal vez que creen guerrillas estilo la mafia italiana en HoI4 , que crees ?

I have a few ways that would make diplomacy better than it already is. 1. being able to hold meetings with other country leaders, a way to make this possible would be similar to how others countries can accept or decline. The conclusion of a meeting would be random to either improve or worsen relations with other countries. 2. Trade should be a way to increase relations with other countries. 3. When at war with a country that’s facing multiple opponents, to increase the chances of allying with other countries at war with that country.

Introducing Irregular warfare: In the original game rebels Are too easy to defeat and Insurgent/resistance forces such as terrorist organizations lack depth, and they pose little to no strategic threats. Likewise, when a nation is on its last leg it becomes all too easy to defeat, however if you were to add guerilla warfare mechanics into the game, therefore enabling irregular troops to remain in the same province while avoiding direct combat with the enemy it would allow for more realistic warfare making it more difficult and intriguing to Fight with/or play as an Insurgent force. Mechanics: Basic Mechanics of the Guerilla forces(make playable)…

I could help with Latvian translation

Hello! I came here to share an idea for AOH3: Customs Union Basically, every country has its own customs union (with its limitations or not) and adding this to the game would also add a economic focus to the game! Basically, there will be 2 more research's and 2 new laws: Research's: Local Market and Globalization Laws: Local Market and Global Market Customs unions are supposed to work, basically, as alliances do, but instead of being military, they give economic bonuses. https://imgur.com/gallery/xAvdzna Also, there would be a new type of Bonus, called Dividends. Basically, Dividends % are based on how much …

Will players be able to make their own HRE-like decentralised organisations? For example if you want to create the USSR but not as a proper country and more as just a hanging entity with the members being politically part of it but doing their own thing at the same time? Also in the editor things like that could be added if you want a fractured but not fractured USA, and the states vote on which one will hold the organisation's leader and that, or if you want the EU then you could create that.

I think it's a good idea to add natural disasters as random events in AoH 3,like earthquakes,floods,tsunamis,volcanic eruption,avalanche and etc. Those disasters affects economy,population,infrastructure and etc. Also this might affect army loss to. And lastly "Natrual Disasters" must have enable and disable features. What do you all think?

The title's self explanatory, i think it'd be a nice addition to AOH3 if we could change an Alliance's name without having to resort to glitches or having to start a new game.

@Łukasz Jakowski Hello, few months ago I've posted some suggestions for AOH3, which of few was added into the game. So I've made some more suggestions. Tell me what you think: 1. Advisor description This one is simple, but it's also a great detail. Political advisors are confirmed. So basically, we could make custom advisor and make a short description for him, which player would be able to see after pointing mouse. As I said before, simple, but also a great detail. Would be nice to see it in the game. 2. Civilization status Each civilization would have it's own statuses. Something like national spirits in HOI4, very similar thing. For example - T…

nothing much make it basic just like dummy nation just a basic multiplayer all im asking

In Age of history 3 I think it would be a good idea to add a feature where you can add words like your countries name or for states. for example.

(Firstly, sorry for my bad english) Here is how I think AI should work in declaring wars. AI is more likely to attack countries that it needs to formable nation. AI should attack countries that are very close to Bot. AI is more likely to attack It's bordering countries. =================================================================================== AI Ally diplomacy Player should have option to choose before the game statistic "AI forming Allies" if player would set it very high, then AI would make a lot of Ally's. When Ally of the bot is at the war, then AI can send proposition to help at war. When Ally of bot is at war, but …

Hello, I have a simple idea that will make the economy better. Add the unemployment system, and when you build factories, unemployment will decrease, and when everyone has jobs, you will be unable to build more new factories. It's funny that in AOC2, there are times when the number of factories is greater than the population