Suggestions

Dynamic Economic Model: While I greatly appreciate the enhancements made to the economic model in Age of History 3 compared to its predecessor, Age of History 2. I believe there is still significant potential for further refinement and improvement. Core Components of the Economic Model: Resource Production and Management: The resource system in the game is already highly refined and nearly perfect; indeed, I found it challenging to identify any immediate improvements. However, I would like to propose a few enhancements that could further elevate the system, promoting a more dynamic and fluid economic experience. Resource Categories: …

Hallo mein people, today we'll be talking about surrendering, troop supply, and support. Starting with, Surrendering: Now I don't mean surrender on a macro scale, Im talking about on the scale of a division. When you're in a battle there will be little surrender tab, with a lil' white flag. Once you hit the button, your division will turn white and won't be able to attack. After that the nation can, Kill the units Take them as prisoners. (note I am focusing mainly on infantry) Troop supply: "A soldier without his gun is just a man, a tank without oil is just metal, and an artillery unit without shells is just a tube." - Łukasz Jakowski. That might …

Need only come 1512 for Aoh3 people will like it so much

@Łukasz Jakowski i cant translate other ones cuz my site is full of texts, may you check the others from google translate? (your language to Turkish and add it)

As its name indicates, I am referring to global news, for example, Germany unifies all countries, a type of event emerges since this would be an important event in the country.

Hello, Today I want to aboard the idea of claims. I will be somewhat important for historical and modern conflicts. It will bring a plus for diplomacy. It is based on formable nations. Claims defending the attachment to a State of certain territories which, in its eyes, should legitimately be so, for example because they were once part of it or because their population is considered by these nationalists as historically, ethnically or linguistically related. As you can see, to implement this, there needs to be a cultural feature, but since there is no confirmation, I won't take it in consideration. Before I show how this could be added, here's the effect …

add multiplayer which can be played with friends or add you can play with multiple countries at the same time like in AOC2

Hello mein people today we'll be talking about supply, this is a repost. I lost my scc and I am salvaging my ideas, Supply: There should be more pronounced supply issues, like if you try to cross mountains your divisions will move slower and you'll lose troops, maybe a flank or two. That discourages going through mountains. [Example: You're china and you try to move your divisions through the Himalayas. Due to it having poor supply and it being amountain range. You go really slow and you loose many troops]. Now let's talk about Russia [stereotypical russian background music] Russia is big and for most of its existence underdevolped, so if the provinces you're moving…

Hello everyone, There were interesting foreshadowed features about monarchy, where monarchic countries were specified by rank, like minor countries count, major countries kingdoms, etc... This feature would make the game more immersive and skirmish. This feature would be mainly automatic, except for empires and caliphate. This feature would be based on rank, religion and if it is added, cultures. Imagine seeing that Ottoman Empire in 1444 is a sultanate, and in 1517 a caliphate ! It will bring more variety to the game. Template : Monarchy Level Monarch name …

Personally i LOVE the pallette editor, it makes scenarios like ww2 look much better with the less bright colors. But a big problem i had with it is that it only has 3 default uneditable pallettes, my idea is for there to be a thing in it that you click on a nation and a color wheel pops up to make it any color you want

i added and fixed some of it @Łukasz Jakowski

Hi Lukasz and others, i'm making a translation now. My nickname is: TapokNegrika ukrainian-translation.txt

In aoh2, most terrain types don’t actually matter for example, mountains can give you a defense bonus, but since the bonus is so small, it’s mostly negligible, and it’s mostly a minor inconvenience at most. I suggest making the bonuses and negatives in terrain more exaggerated, maybe increase the defense bonus to atleast 30-60%, additionally it may be a good idea to add special terrain types for extremely tall mountain ranges, such as the himalayas and the alps with even more exaggerated attributes

It would be nice to have some system of "Personal Union" between two or more monarchies. The monarch of your country becomes the monarch of another, so you can subjugate that nation or just invest in it. And of course, the color of the subjugated nation must be the same as the dominant nation. I thought about this when I saw Finland in 1836.

i hope Lukasz sees this i e-mailed him

my progress so far, its hard to do it on phone so, really i just wanna translate and be in the game for one, i am playing this game since 2018 so that would be great so that would be great if i will be able to be in the game by just doing the Turkish translations 😛

With Fog of War you can only observe actions taking place in the following provinces: - Your own provinces - Provinces of your allies and subjects - Provinces directly bordering your own - Troops act like scouts, pushing back the FoW as they move, revealing enemy activity What do you think about how it works?

This is a small but cool idea that popped up in my head while I was playing AoH2! How would the feature work? It would be pretty cool if you were able to add internal subdivisions when playing as a nation in AoH3: It would work similarly to the "release vassal" option in AoH2, meaning that you'd be able to select an already existing civilization, select certain provinces for it and give it a capital city, except that it would register as a subdivision of your nation. Subdivisions would most likely be visible in a special map mode (which would probably just be called "subdivisions"). What's the purpose of it? The main purpose of this feature is to help …

I suggest the adding of a capitulation, this can solve problem present in previous entries and add realism to the game, it can be infuriating seeing large countries survive even though they only have one province left in some random island, so i suggest adding a capitulation system based on stability. The more provinces are occupied by the enemy, the more your stability suffers, additionally, your capital city will be of larger value, if your capital city gets occupied, and your stability suffers. This can lead to rebellions (Also, maybe try making rebellions more frequent and more powerfull), and if it gets really low, total captulation (all your provinces get automatica…

make it multiplayer or gay

I think it’d be nice if vassals had to ask permission from their ruler before doing diplomatic actions, for example, make it so they have to ask their ruler permission to make alliances, trade, improve or insult relations, offer or ask for military access, declare war, etc. Also make it so nations can influence vassals to rebel against their ruler, also make it so rulers can change their vassals ideology

my idea is to make it so that normally you cannot declare war on a country without providing a justification, maybe you had a button to create a casus belli in certain provinces, and the number of provinces selected and time ti create could depend on the level/skill of your military/diplomatic administrator, and when you have those war points and make a peace agreement you can select only the provinces with casus belli done, perhaps the justification could be lost with the death of the king/election of a new one or with the passage of time. and so the more recent the start date, the more provinces could be selected in less time. Perhaps it could also be said that if your …

@Łukasz Jakowski'yetarihin yaşı 3 antarktika ekle antartika anlaşması

Hello forum. I am a regular AOH player. And I got acquainted with this series of games a long time ago. I started with the first part. I recently joined this forum in order to help Łukasz in his work. I hesitated to write to you for a long time, but I realized that it was necessary to act, as I watched the progress of the development and noticed for myself some points that I think should be fixed. Please forgive me for any inaccuracies, because I use a translator. Here are some of my comments and suggestions: 1. The scenario of the early Middle Ages (for example, the Battle of Soissons and the expulsion of the Romans from Gaul - 486 AD). 2. In my opinion…

Will there be any possibility of development our country in the 2024 scenario? Or maybe all highly developed countries will be so strong in the game that it will no longer be possible to develop them in 2024 There should be possibility to develop modern technologies unlocking new, stronger futuristic units (invisible armor, satelite weapon - it can be an improved version of planes or smth like that The maximum economy in a province should increase with each newly developed technology. In AoH2, both 1440 and 2018 had a very similar starting economy. I hope this will be fixed in AoH 3. In fact, the economy in the 21st century is 3,000 times bigger than it was …