Suggestions

hi, today i will explain why some uruguayan province names should be changed, as an uruguayan myself. tl:dr, not representative enough names. this is sponsored by the q-bam project at the left we have the tarariras province, which it should be changed to "colonia", since: the name "colonia" for that area pretty much exists from the 1600's; tarariras' origin is around the 1800's the department of colonia has a name for a reason. colonia is 3x times a larger city at the right we have punta del este, the name should be changed to "maldonado", since again maldonado is an older city, remounting to the 1750's, punta del este is from t…

make a features for Military access after Mediaeval age (1400) Military can't access Without permission make a features for Military access before Mediaeval age if Military access permission The relation between countries go down and it can Lead to war\ or make something similar (english is not my first)

Would it be possible to have 3d units, or some symbol to represent the troops? Such as a spear on the map to represent infantry, a horse symbol for cavalry, etc

Before starting the game, there should be an option to select fog of war settings: the slightest fog of war - near the border provinces we see the enemy army, both the number and type of units moderate fog of war - near the border provinces we see the enemy army but only number of army. And we dont see type of units heavy fog of war - near the border provinces we see the enemy army but without any details. We do not know how many this army is or what units it consists of Role of spies - sending a spy allows us to see all the details of the enemy army over the entire surface of the enemy country THE FOG OF WAR SHOULD NOT BE POSSIBLE TO TURNED…

My Suggestion is that the game get a new User interface after the release in a separate update, the current one is too eu4-ish, and i feel like a style with the Colors and shapes used for the one we have but with a similar layout to aoh2 would be kind of unique and would add soul to the game and separate it from eu4, right now it seems WAY TOO SIMILAR THAT SOME MIGHT SAY IT'S COPIED Thoughts? i just think the game needs more ⭐ Soul ⭐

create a program to transfer maps and scenarios, civilizations, leaders from Age of History 2 to Age of History 3 or create editor for transfer age of history 2 mods to age of history 3

Alright so this may be sound kinda ridiculous but I thought about upgrading your units like archers, swordsmen, machine gunners, tanks, etc., so basically what I meant about upgrading is that each of any unit class like for example: Machine Gunner lvl 1 Dmg 50 Speed 30 Defense 20 Machine Gunner lvl 2 Dmg 60 Speed 40 Defense 30 Machine Gunner lvl 3 Dmg 70 Speed 50 Defense 40 And this can be applied to every unit and they would need resources to upgrade them like for example: Upgrade Machine Gunner lvl 2: needs 50 Steel, 40 Food, 60 Gold Upgrade Machine Gunner lvl 3: needs 70 Steel, 60 Food, 80 Gold And as for like Tanks and Airplanes they…

What about adding laws? Or making own

What do you think about adding your own reforms or embedded reforms?

Volunteers in war from allied countries not directly involved in the war. That is, the ally country temporarily transfers its divisions to the player

Yep, as you know in AOH2 the event system isnt that good and sometime its buggy maybe my suggestion can uh make the event system better?? Okay 1: We can select multiple countries to receive the event so the selected country can get its buff/debuffs or historical events that the country participated in. 2:Events with sounds yep like in uwut engine you can insert sound to the events maybe aoh3 can make the event's choice selecting have sounds or songs after selected the choice 3:Tell me if im wrong okay? In mobile i remember we cant let our events have descriptions maybe Lukasz can add a choice to let the event have descriptions easier 4:Events can …

look at the title

sadsadadadd

This concept is really simple, in 2022, all the civ's have assigned religions which makes no sense since the USA for example is very diverse but wouldn't convert provinces to catholicism because they don't promote religion IRL this option really just adds a new option for religion: No State Religion Is An Option, it removes the debuffs for all religion And Buffs but adds +5% stability, additionally, atheism will convert slowly in provinces with high development, this option won't be available until the french revolution though state atheism on the other hand is a whole different thing, the state will opress religion and will convert provinc…

Will there be conditions in which AoH3 is deemed "won" or "lost"? Will it be purely a sandbox experience? i.e. to "win" a game you must: - conquer x% of the map - build x number of wonders - have x number of vassals or alliances - convert x regions to your religion - Research the most tech - Reach x income - Have x number exports / trade routes A few random ideas there, would love for this game to be "winnable" in some way Very excited for this game! Keeping a close eye on the development

Could it be possible to do like Darkest Hour did by adding, as an example: Germany has both a "Reichpresident" and a "Reichchancellor"?

It would be possible to make the mechanics of dismantling the empire like the one in Victoria II?

The mechanics of establishing/breaking diplomatic relations could perfectly complement the diplomacy in the game. It would be possible to establish/request, as well as break off diplomatic relations with other civilizations, as well as demand recognition as a peacy treaty condition (both the civilization itself and all its vassals/allies will be recognized, this is useful when playing as minor unrecognized civilizations, as well as for civilizations with a very large number of satellites, for example, as it was with France during the Revolutionary/Napoleonic Wars). Without mutual recognition with another civilization, diplomatic functions with it may be limited …

hi 1. ideologies with purposes: I suggest that ideologies have purposes for example fascist countries be able to declare wars more easily, communist countries are better at spyware and influencing other countries to switch to communism too if a political system between the ideologies were to be added, while democratic countries ig are better at like gureenting & merchant republics get economic bonuses, theocratic countries get better conversion rates like that so each ideology gets buffs and debuffs that come along w it 2. a basic political system like hoi4 has: (maybe for countries from 1900+) to expand on this political syst…

I think the game really needs historical AI that is programmed to try and achieve certain goals (at least for relevant nations) and that has situational awareness. If a nation is losing badly, it should know to try and make peace. It was always really annoying in Age of History 2 when we had to take over most of the nation to get what we wanted out of the conflict. To go into more detail about what I mean by "AI Objectives", the AI should be inclined to go after territories that it historically claimed and wanted control over. I know that this will only be accurate up until a certain point, as you will no longer know what that nation historically desired, the nation can b…

I have discussed with a friend about possible features to the resources function of the game. The idea below is not mine, but my friends. He simply wanted me to post it here on my account; As you know resources are already in the game, the idea is that resources will have special outputs based on the provinces, for example Istanbul will produce 1.5 units of steel per day whereas Ankara will produce 1.0 . These units would be collected in a tab, where we can see our total amount, we can use those units of resources to build, for example, factories. Let's say your whole nation is producing 5 units of steel per day, and you built a factory that consumes 6, the productio…

I think that having the same battle machanics for every era would be really historically inacurate. For example, if Lukasz does not change this, you would have to siege fortress on a modern world scenario the same way you would on a middle ages scenario. Therefore I believe it is essencial for the game to have a kind of development of this mechanic through time

If you're seeking assistance with Kayo Sports in Australia, forums can be invaluable resources. Users often share tips, troubleshooting advice, and even contact information for customer support. When looking for the Kayo Sports Contact Number+61 38 5942 240:, forums can connect you with fellow subscribers who might have firsthand experience. However, exercise caution when relying solely on information from forums, as it may not always be accurate or up to date. Consider verifying details through Kayo Sports' official website or contacting them directly. Additionally, third-party service providers might offer alternative contact options or assist with resolving issues rela…

In the game, it is possible to choose different people as ministers, army commanders, etc., you can take a woman from other tribes or from your own tribes and improve your relations with that country, there are economic alliances, better colonization capabilities. If it exists, it means that we will receive more money and economy, we will have the possibility to lead a revolution or even be a party leader to rise at the right time, the support of the rebels should not only be with money, but we can also give them soldiers, and the most important thing is that Historical events should be better expressed, for example, the attack of Genghis Khan or the attack of the Huns

In the game, it is possible to choose different people as ministers, army commanders, etc., you can take a woman from other tribes or from your own tribes and improve your relations with that country, there are economic alliances, better colonization capabilities. we will have the possibility to lead a revolution or even be a party leader to rise at the right time, the support of the rebels should not only be with money, but we can also give them soldiers, and the most important thing is that Historical events should be better expressed, for example, the attack of Genghis Khan or the attack of the Huns