Suggestions

For example, I want to disable/enable neutral land colonization for every nation after trigger. Or increase the lethality of diseases after another trigger.

This is must and manny countries was under it and in modern day we have new state of talibans that formed,iran,saudi,qatar…

Im not exactly sure if this is already a part of the plan, but i will suggest it regardless. If the player is watching the timelapse of a game, and their map is zoomed out; Each individual army will be represented as their country’s flag instead of numbers. Something like the Hearts Of Iron IV timelapses that you see on YouTube. Thoughts? In my opinion, i think it looks really cool because it showcases the sheer scale and size of a war happening in the game that you are not really able to see when viewing it through a timelapse in AOH2. Here are some images for reference:

Will civil wars in modern scenario (Somalia, yemen, Libya, syria, Ukraine conflict (lpr & dpr) etc) be pressnt @Łukasz Jakowski

It is known that during a war, the economy of the country changes - at the beginning, spending on the army increases, and when the war goes badly, or if it has lasted too long, the recruitment of civilians into the army increases, which reduces the population and economy Therefore, when setting the budget, I think that in army maintenance, if we select the "increased pay" option, we should get two additional minuses: -1% population and -5% economy. This option should be used by AI only when the bot is losing the war or after 2 years when manpower runs out. The "default" option should be enabled by AI at the beginning of war, and the "decreased pay" option should be e…

A country powerful enough can have the ability to create an international council and basically choose the leaders of this council, kinda like the UN, this however is not to be confused with an economic or military alliance, this is no alliance. This could lead to: Countries imposing sanctions on another country (with justification, like them taking over another territory without justification, kinda like the casus beli in eu4.) And if other countries happen to have bad relations with the nation that is imposing the sanctions, they'll end up vetoeing against it. However, they can also abstain if they are a neutral nation (positive or negative relations with both…

I propose that declaring war is only possible with relations - 25, but declaring war against a country with a different religion is possible easier with relations - 15 Or faster damaging relations between countries that have different religions

I don't have a detailed idea so help me in comments My general thought is to have some attraction buildings in the game such as wonders, airports, tourism centers, etc which attracts tourists. Also high stability causes more tourists come to your country. Beside its economical bonuses it can have benefits such converting your religion in first stages of game or maybe improving your relations with other countries or anything else that makes sense about tourism

i think this would be a good idea for sharing creations with other users

In the game there could be different types of defenses a player can create. Those being trenches, forts, bunkers, beach fortifications (like Normandy) etc. There could be a map mode that allows you to see them, and areas with these fortifications could be harder to conquer, however, they'll only function if there are troops in the defended area. The player could also have the ability to lay landmines in a certain province, to deteriorate the enemy's troops. The NPC of course can also have the ability to do this as well. This could make WW2 scenarios better as players can have the ability to fortify places like Alsace-Lorraine for a more accurate scenar…

AOH2 was easy to assimilate and easy to suppress rebellions. I believe that assimilation should be completely removed, and instead a panel of occupied territories should be made, where broad autonomy could be given, or, on the contrary, very low, and so that the rebels would be many times stronger

So i posted a topic about tourism and got comments about migration so decided to post another and talk about that I don't know how much the game is near to reality but I talk about real word then we can decide which parts are useful for the game Migrations categorized by reasons: Natural reasons: flooding, earth quake or other disasters in old living place and fertile lands in new one Artificial reasons: bad economical situation, war or dictatorship in old living place and better economy and stability in new one

Countries can have the option to create companies, and those companies can expand throughout the world through trade. Many of them being arms companies, motor companies etc. This could lead to allies using each-other's companies to create different types of weapons, companies can also boost the speed a weapon is made/a vehicle/soldier is created. Also the better/more popular a company is, the more stronger the soldiers will be. These companies can be custom or already existing ones (depending on player choice.)

Currently it is the Soviet Union which does not make sense, when it is not a union of multiple nations. Instead it should be Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic OR Russian SFSR for short The same could (in theory) apply to other nations, especially the post-soviet ones.

Isn't there a feature to change the flag in the game? What I mean is,We can change ideologies when playing games, or even change names in the previous AOH2 series.. So maybe it would be better to add a feature to change flags during the game, I usually release a vassal country and play as a vassal country because there is no this feature, right... I'm not forcing, I'm just sharing ideas😁

The game could have the ability in which a leader can either step down when stability is low and be replaced (or get assassinated by spies using the spy network feature, they can also meet their end by natural causes). What I mean by this is that the player can choose a successor to the previous leader that has their own advantages and disadvantages. As for heirs, leaders can marry a local within their country or from another country. (this can improve relations with said country). And they can have children in which the player can choose as heir. And like successors they can have their own benefits. Players can also recruit their heirs as generals in the b…

Provinces translation - names of the cities translated to the language you are using toggle translation - possibility to toggle the translation of the names of cities (to mimic aoh2)

In recent trailers, we can see that the types of government (like in AoC2) include completely different (from the point of view of social science) characteristics of government: in addition to ideologies (communism, fascism, etc.), there're also forms of government (monarchy, republic and their types), types of political regimes (democracy and dictatorship, which can be implied as totalitarianism or authoritarianism) and other special characteristics: for example, type of administrative-territorial organization (city-state), methods of power sharing (daimyo), other types (theocracy). This creates a heterogeneity of government types and, among other things, leads to d…

Happy birthday, Łukasz. Will there be a United Nations to make decisions, make peace, and stop wars? You can also put a proposal to the United Nations, for example preventing Germany from arming. It would be very useful if you added it and it would make the game more realistic.

🙂

I'm wondering if Age of History 3 will feature multiplayer or any similar mode? I'm eagerly awaiting its release and sincerely hope it does! Please, Luskas, don't let us down.

Trade between coutries, for example gold for manpower

LPR & DPR NagaroKarabakh Somaliland Western Sahara & All civil wars

Happy Birthday Lukasz, i wish you a very big success with AoH3 and many other things in life! but most importantly take a big break. Wish you all the best Lukasz!