Age of History 3 - Publisher?

[Dipto479 107]

l

1 minute ago, qxz said:

Game Scout is a genuine role

Think about that Lucas collaborate with eu5 Developers

[uwut 1,466]

to be honest;
i think you should accept it, it can improve age of history alot, BUT don't let them go too far

also i think "paradox is scammer" comments are toxic and not logical

[Edmilson Gomes 10]

7 minutes ago, Unity said:

sim, seria, mas não pagaria por cada DLC 

É só não pagar então amigo, joga o jogo base, é melhor o jogo ter essas dlcs do que depois de uns 2 anos ficar abandonado por não ter atualizações 

[OwnM3Z0 1,088]

4 minutes ago, qxz said:

Game Scout is a genuine role

Still highly doubt it

 

 

 

''Ello saar, i am from Baradoks, we want to bublish your game, bleaze give to us for testing''

 

microsoft scammer ahh approach, there is ZERO indication that it's actually paradox other than the guy claiming it is, and there is no real reason paradox would want aoh3 other than to quell competition because they're afraid, which is the only somewhat likely scenario

[Edmilson Gomes 10]

3 minutes ago, uwut said:

para ser honesto;
eu acho que você deveria aceitar isso, isso pode melhorar muito a idade da história, MAS não os deixe ir longe demais,

também acho que os comentários do tipo "paradoxo são golpistas" são tóxicos e não lógicos

Pois é, esse povo é sem noção 

[ZingZong 8]

Do this and if they want to collaborate with the game, make sure they don't overload the DLC or make the price of the game too high, remember that you are trying to publish a game for both cell phones and computers! in addition to being a very famous indie game.

Just try to be as cautious with negotiations as possible,
do as much as you can to try to make your base community happy with this decision.

[Outlawexperience 338]

Just now, OwnM3Z0 said:

Still highly doubt it

 

 

 

''Ello saar, i am from Baradoks, we want to bublish your game, bleaze give to us for testing''

 

microsoft scammer ahh approach, there is ZERO indication that it's actually paradox other than the guy claiming it is, and there is no real reason paradox would want aoh3 other than to quell competition because they're afraid, which is the only somewhat likely scenario

Look at their email address bruh, there's literally proof this is a game scout from paradox themselves 

[anonymous8 60]

As long as the game will also release on mobile and won't have DLCs or paid stuff, I think you should accept, it would significantly boost game's popularity

Otherwise, no

[Edmilson Gomes 10]

Just now, anonymous8 said:

Contanto que o jogo também seja lançado para dispositivos móveis e não tenha DLCs ou itens pagos, acho que você deveria aceitar, isso aumentaria significativamente a popularidade do jogo.

Caso contrário, não

Tu prefere que não tenha atualizações e o jogo caia no esquecimento ou prefere ter dlcs?

[OwnM3Z0 1,088]

DO NOT DO IT, THEY WILL ROB THE GAME OF ITS IDENTITY AND WILL CONTROL WHAT YOU ADD OR DONT ADD, THEY WILL PUT EVERY SCENARIO BEHIND A PAYWALL, KILLING THE GAME

[Wayne23lololh 1,625]

One question :

If Łukasz accepts, what do you think Paradox would do with ?

Edited May 2 by Wayne23lololh

[qxz 617]

2 minutes ago, OwnM3Z0 said:

Still highly doubt it

 

 

 

''Ello saar, i am from Baradoks, we want to bublish your game, bleaze give to us for testing''

 

microsoft scammer ahh approach, there is ZERO indication that it's actually paradox other than the guy claiming it is, and there is no real reason paradox would want aoh3 other than to quell competition because they're afraid, which is the only somewhat likely scenario

Yeah as Outlaw said the email signature is the same...

[qxz 617]

Just now, Wayne23lololh said:

Just one question :

If Łukasz accepts, what do you think Paradox would do with ?

Honestly, I doubt it is all going to be bad, I just dont want the game lose its identity. 

For Lukasz it might be a massive boost to the development and his earnings, so I will not blame him if he chooses to partner with Paradox.

Time will tell

[anonymous8 60]

1 minute ago, Edmilson Gomes said:

Tu prefere que não tenha atualizações e o jogo caia no esquecimento ou prefere ter dlcs?

If the game is enjoyable and doesn't have game-breaking bugs, yes I would prefer no updates over DLCs and paywalls

[Rodak Polak 596]

10 minutes ago, uwut said:

i think you should accept it, it can improve age of history alot

What improvements do you have in mind? I do not see any

[Hitler the secend 113]

Just now, Wayne23lololh said:

Just one question :

If Łukasz accepts, what do you think Paradox would do with ?

A video game publisher is in charge of financing and of course publishing the game. Big companies also do the distribution.

 

The funding can definitely help him. But again we have to see the conditions. 

[Edmilson Gomes 10]

2 minutos atrás, anônimo8 disse:

Se o jogo for divertido e não tiver bugs que quebrem o jogo, sim, eu prefiro nenhuma atualização a DLCs e acesso pago

Oh2 era desse jeito, e ficou chato

Edited May 2 by Edmilson Gomes
K

[muhoaga 124]

 

 

If you can reach an agreement with the Paradox company to a certain extent, it would be very beneficial, but I recommend you to maintain your boundaries.

 

This year, we have seen many new massive strategy games emerge, and they will continue to come out. The most famous of these is undoubtedly Manor Lords, but it's not just that; "Grey Eminence," similar to Victoria 3, "Gilded Destiny," a game resembling EU4, and many more games in this genre have been announced. Paradox Interactive's monopoly on these types of games is more threatened than ever before, but this doesn't change their status as the globally recognized game company for grand strategy games. They have also announced new games, but the years 2024-2025 might be a bit challenging for them if they don't collaborate with other independent developers and companies. This could be an opportunity for you according to them, but I'm not sure if it's an opportunity for players, especially for the fans of Age of History game.

 

Lukasz did not release any updates after the release of Age of History 2, which caused players, including myself, to hold a grudge against Lukasz, and I am still upset about this. Will Age of History 3 receive updates after its release without reaching an agreement with any external company, this is one of my most important questions.

 

If you reach an agreement with Paradox, will all the rights of the game continue to belong to you?

Will the Paradox company assist in the development phase or updates?

 

What kind of benefits will the Paradox company gain?

If the Paradox company joins, will the game prices change, what kind of profits will be made?

 

If an agreement is reached with Paradox, will DLCs be purchased or will there be free updates?

Will there be updates for mobile and other platforms if a deal is made with the Paradox company?

 

Most importantly, will the players' requests be heard?

 

I ask these questions not only to Lukasz but to every friend.

[Rodak Polak 596]

I think that cooperation with Paradox will be suicide for your company, but you will earn more on AoH 3 if you will colaborate, so:
If AoH 3 is to be your last game in your life and at the end of your gaming adventure you want to earn a lot of money, accept the offer, but if you don't want to stop creating your own games and you want to further develop your company, decline it.

Edited May 2 by Rodak Polak

[GyLala 342]

No publisher! if will steal you money same likes EA capitalism

Edited May 2 by GyLala

[GyLala 342]

Bullfrog Productions made game with EA published 1998 year. its now Steam (2024 year) https://store.steampowered.com/app/2616430/Populous_The_Beginning/ already dev 2001 year Defunct https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullfrog_Productions
see thats EA steal games money?

Edited May 2 by GyLala

[paul2kdj 118]

Don't do it!!! It will likely result in paradox stealing your hard work and getting credit for building such a great game. They will not waste time releasing ridiculous DLCs to make the game unplayable unless you pay for them. The benefits don't outweigh the negatives

[Kerem Yılmaz 2,718]

2 hours ago, Łukasz Jakowski said:

Does Age of History 3 need a publisher? What do you think?

 

If Paradox Interactive will add a multiplayer mod to the game, yes. If they won't add it, no.

[Wayne23lololh 1,625]

7 minutes ago, Kerem Yılmaz said:

If Paradox Interactive will add a multiplayer mod to the game, yes. If they won't add it, no.

Accept only because it could give multiplayer ? You're joking right ?

For now, let's all forget plans about multiplayer. 

[Kerem Yılmaz 2,718]

6 minutes ago, Wayne23lololh said:

Accept only because it could give multiplayer ? You're joking right ?

For now, let's all forget plans about multiplayer. 

A better answer: 

If Paradox Interactive will add a multiplayer mod to the game, yes. If they won't add it, no. Cuz they will make just some unnecessary DLC's and a high fee for the game..

 

I think Lukasz can be a better publisher than Paradox for Age of History 3 because he deals directly with his players' suggestions.

 

Also, I think you don't understand the importance of multiplayer mod. The game may become boring after a few hours, but with multiplayer it can be played for months or maybe years without getting bored. (see also EU4, HOI4)

 

 

 

Edited May 2 by Kerem Yılmaz