1440 - 2442 Timelapse - Age of History 3, 1000 Years!

[Marerjh 184]

59 minutes ago, Bargor said:

I think that there should be a chance for AI to change the ideology after researching it (communism, fascism, national socialism)

But why? What's the point, there is no cons of being monarchy etc 😗

Rebels is what should cause government change. No country in the world changed its government type because it decided so

Edited Thursday at 03:16 PM by Marerjh

[ARWD 75]

17 minutes ago, Marerjh said:

But why? What's the point, there is no cons of being monarchy etc 😗

Rebels is what should cause government change. No country in the world changed its government type because it decided so

Yes, this makes sense. Unfortunately, I see revolutions that are more like independence than regime change.

[Praefectus Italicum 30]

I watched entirely so I think even if the game is still in Alpha phase there's still a lot work to do but I will give a vote 6/10.

Just because the game is still in development but the game is  next level and you can clearly see a big difference I hope in the future will be added new mechanic to this game because there's a huge potential to make it even better we want cultures to be added like latin greek germanic etc but obviously a lot of cultures.

For now I think that is playable and at the same time I like the new AI improvements.

[Bargor 35]

24 minutes ago, Marerjh said:

But why? What's the point, there is no cons of being monarchy etc 😗

Rebels is what should cause government change. No country in the world changed its government type because it decided so

You have made a good point.

Maybe countries should be able to change ideology after gaining independence or there should be probability of the civil war after losing big amount of provinces.

[Wayne23lololh 1,472]

It's a very nice Timelapse ! However I have some questions:

1. Does AI form nations too ?

2. Will be possible to make communist and fascist rebels more frequent in a certain era, based from the tech tree ?

3. Do you plan to add to civilization "ending era" tag, blocking some civilization to exist after ?

 

[neverger84 51]

1 minute ago, Wayne23lololh said:

Does AI form nations too ?

Inca Empire says a lot

 

[Wayne23lololh 1,472]

2 minutes ago, neverger84 said:

Inca Empire says a lot

 

Already exist in 1440

[Taquito_Dictador 54]

Si bien hubo algo de bordegore, mejoro mucho a comparación de AoH2, es un gran avance en la inteligencia artificial, aunque hay mucho por mejorar, pero va por buen camino

[AgeOfOz 8]

6 hours ago, Unity said:

it feels like Aoc2 again like nothing ever changed 

not good but it won't get fixed at all again 

What is bro talking about💀💀

[Dmitrych Vasilevsky 6]

I liked the video But I have a number of proposals for Lukash.

 

1. Let countries change their ideologies over time, otherwise an ordinary monarchy in 2400 looks very strange.So I have this implementation Let the AI, after the death of its ruler, have a small chance to change its ideology to one of those open to it. 

 

2. I would like the actions of art to be meaningful For example, if a country has the opportunity to form a power, then let it strive to fight and annex these territories. Or, to create a country, only 80-90% of the territory is needed. Then in this video the same Castile would be able to form Spain in a moment, it only lacked islands and one province,occupied by France. This opportunity made it possible to make the map and the game more dynamic and interesting. And then times go by, but the countries are the same. This change would encourage countries to change. 

 

3. Europeans are weakly colonizing America. In the last part they did this, but there was also an irritable part that for example, that Indian and Chinese minors had their colonies in Africa and America, which did not look very good. And now the Europeans have completely given up on America. I would like to see some intermediate option. So that only countries that are quite developed are engaged in colonization, so that Miami does not belong to the Papal State.

Łukasz Jakowski, Please see and implement, I think many will agree with me 

 

[Asomeone 3]

Add an ingame option to set aggressiveness down to 0 if we wanted

[Yorkites 5]

6 hours ago, Joaoj said:

the borders were acceptable until 1700, a great advance😅

Also, Korea simply beat the Ming, in AoH2 I think that would never happen, so it seems like the game will be more diverse

I also thought it was cool that Ming, ottomans and Avaria were broken with the revolts/war

Probably happened because of Ming's lack of MP, inferior units, or bankruptcy

[Rodak Polak 575]

3 hours ago, Marerjh said:

Ale dlaczego? Po co, nie ma żadnych minusów bycia monarchią itp 😗

Rebelianci są tym, co powinno spowodować zmianę rządu. Żaden kraj na świecie nie zmienił typu rządu, ponieważ tak zdecydował

I agree. It's very similar with religion

[Outlawexperience 281]

8 hours ago, Łukasz Jakowski said:

1440 - 2442 Timelapse - Age of History 3, 1000 Years!

 

 

will we get to see ww2 or modern world gameplay ? it would be interesting to see how the ai behaves there

[Das Moss Man 382]

8 hours ago, OwnM3Z0 said:

@Das Moss Man @Wayne23lololhcome check this out, the rebellions feature is cool as hekk

Wow 

[el estrategico 11]

8 hours ago, Marerjh said:

1. 13:36 ¿Por qué los rebeldes uzbekos no formaron un nuevo país? Simplemente ocuparon provincias durante cien años. 

2. ¿Se formaron alianzas? No creo que se hayan formado alianzas. 

3. La colonización de provincias neutrales por naciones africanas es extraña... y ninguna potencia europea ha colonizado nunca nuevas tierras. ¿Por qué?

What are you talking about, Castilla colonized North Africa?

[staldemo 53]

4 hours ago, Dmitrych Vasilevsky said:

I liked the video But I have a number of proposals for Lukash.

 

1. Let countries change their ideologies over time, otherwise an ordinary monarchy in 2400 looks very strange.So I have this implementation Let the AI, after the death of its ruler, have a small chance to change its ideology to one of those open to it.

 

2. I would like the actions of art to be meaningful For example, if a country has the opportunity to form a power, then let it strive to fight and annex these territories. Or, to create a country, only 80-90% of the territory is needed. Then in this video the same Castile would be able to form Spain in a moment, it only lacked islands and one province,occupied by France. This opportunity made it possible to make the map and the game more dynamic and interesting. And then times go by, but the countries are the same. This change would encourage countries to change.

 

3. Europeans are weakly colonizing America. In the last part they did this, but there was also an irritable part that for example, that Indian and Chinese minors had their colonies in Africa and America, which did not look very good. And now the Europeans have completely given up on America. I would like to see some intermediate option. So that only countries that are quite developed are engaged in colonization, so that Miami does not belong to the Papal State.

Łukasz Jakowski, Please see and implement, I think many will agree with me

 

I completely agree with the above and would like Lukasz to listen to these suggestions.

[Noobs Dudes 192]

Amazing timelapse! seeing the nukes go off was very interesting, but dozens of nukes would go off at once. Will there be a nerf to how many nukes you or the ai can send at once? As of right now it looks like it'll be a pain to deal with the nuking for late game playthroughs.

[DRM 27]

About the AI, I’m not very satisfied. In my opinion, the AI has improved, but it feels like it’s from Age of History 2. I don’t know how to explain it, but I feel like the AI seems weak and too balanced, although there’s still a lot to consider.

[PiePants 57]

18 hours ago, OwnM3Z0 said:

amazing timelapse tbh, and the rebellions that happened down in north africa are an amazing feature that i think should be made more frequently the more a civilization expands to prevent blobbing like we saw

 

 

i also suggest making civilizations automatically explode if they lose their starting territory cores, castile lost spain but it still remained in control of africa which isn't logical, so a plugin that caches the starting cores of a civilization in the scenarios and outputs the explode event if they lose them should solve this and make it more realistic since all territory outside the starting cores will most likely have foreign cores already since its conquered territory (maybe territory with no cores like colonial territory could become uncolonized provinces like the ones in the new world)

 

one last thing, i think adding a small penalty in battle for non colonial decree civilizations that fight outside their continent is a simple, good but logical feature

 

Love this idea! Topple the capital of a foreign and watch the empire collapse - unless there's a designated "move capital" function

[alpht 1]

This is much stronger than age of history II

[Noobs Dudes 192]

11 hours ago, DRM said:

About the AI, I’m not very satisfied. In my opinion, the AI has improved, but it feels like it’s from Age of History 2. I don’t know how to explain it, but I feel like the AI seems weak and too balanced, although there’s still a lot to consider.

It's still 19 days away, we can hopefully see some improvements by then.

[Thee OG Emerald EYE 15]

On 10/3/2024 at 8:39 AM, KingBee said:

In 23:55 I saw lights appear on Ajam, Where those nukes?

Yes, yes they were.

[kyper4629 7]

egglcxxzkkaAAHHHAHSHSJDJDJDJDJDJaph3aoh3aoh3aoh3

thats what i say in my sleep

[ConRadical 2]

I noticed that there seemed to be a lot of concentrated population in Utrecht and Stolp, was this because of nukes being used to kill people everywhere else? And if so, would it give neutral countries an advantage in the later stages of the game where nukes start getting used in wars?