Jump to content
Age of History 3
Redguy325

1440 - A bit of redrawing Silesia

Recommended Posts

I will be using mostly Polish sources to strengthen my claims.

Generally, the provinces quite nicely allow for a faithful reconstruction of the Silesia of that time, but still 1440 borders tend not to use them.

1. Duchy of Teschen/Cieszyn
Currently, in 1440 scenario, it controls two provinces - Cieszyn and Katowice. While the first one is an obvious capital, the second one is weird. I see no reason for Katowice or this part of Silesia in general to be part of Duchy of Cieszyn. In reality, Duchy of Cieszyn from XIV to XX century hadn't changed and looked like this:


image.png.5611025d2d6d5896c044712d0f6f1b2f.png

It never controlled any part of the Katowice province, but it controlled something else; Territory east of Olza river, on the modern Czech territory. It controlled more or less the territory of later Zaolzie region, in game represented as Třinec. What's better, if we merge these two provinces into one state, we get almost perfect Duchy of Teschen. I think Třinec should be taken away from Bohemia and given to Teschen, while Katowice should be taken away from Teschen.

What should be done exactly with Katowice? I believe that new duchy should be added - Duchy of Pszczyna. It was small duchy that in fact controlled what is modern day city of Katowice. Also I believe that when owned by Pszczyna, province should be also named Pszczyna - as Katowice didn't even exist in 1440. Pszczyna was ruled by Helena Korybutówna, Niece of King Jagiełło, so it could have good relations with Poland at the beginning of the game.

2. Jeseník
Jeseník as province is obviously meant to be part of Silesia. Jeseník as a real town was at the time part of the Duchy of Nysa. It was actually historically a very important part of this Duchy, as much later on, in XVIII century after Silesian Wars, City of Nysa was annexed by Prussia. The Duchy of Nysa didn't cease to exist however, as the modern-day-Czechian part was still under the control of Nysian bishop. So, in reality Jesenik province was actually more or less how the Duchy of Nysa looked like, and before Silesian Wars it was almost exactly half of the Duchy. This should be annexed by Nysa.

3. Klodzko
Klodzko town was at the time under the direct of the Bohemian crown, so it should be returned to Bohemia

4. Zgorzelec
Zgorzelec wasn't the part of the Silesia at the time. It was part of Lusatian region. Moreover, when under Lusatian control, it should be named "Görlitz" as I see no reason for it to have a Polish name. It was not Polish city at the time. It should be either part of Lusatian vassal state of Bohemia, or direct part of Bohemian crown.

Map after my changes:

image.png.c09263d8fac0d98704e4cc69af5a8afa.png

The outcome would look like that:
image.thumb.png.8b27ab38f7846da219f7511914825e01.png



5. Small addition: - Rawicz was not a Silesian city. It belonged to Greater Poland (Wielkopolska). Rawicz isn't even on the territory of the province of Rawicz. I believe that this city should be replaced with either Ścinawa (small town today, but was important in the middle ages) or Wołów (Not much important in the middle ages, but the largest city in this region today, twice as large as the Ścinawa).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Important note* What is duchy of Silesia/Wroclaw here was at the time actually direct realm of Bohemian King, but I believe it was not considered part of Bohemia, rather still part of Silesia. And as part of Silesia, proper starosts were appointed to rule that land. It was kept in vassal-like scheme. Still I believe territories that weren't Silesia shouldn't be controlled by this entity. Klodzko was at the time part of Bohemia proper, Gorlitz was in the similar state but it was Lusatia, not Silesia.

@Łukasz Jakowski Do you consider at this point any changes on map in any scenario?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Our picks

    • Age of History 3 - October 23rd, 2024 - Official release date
      Age of History 3 - Official release date

       

      Steam: October 23rd, 2024

      Android: When it's ready

      iOS: When it's ready

      Epic: When it's ready

       
    • Campaign: Small Scenarios
      In this topic, share your ideas for Campaign scenarios.

      These scenarios focus on a small part of the map, with the rest designated as wasteland.

       

      For example, a scenario of the Reconquista in 1054, where gameplay takes place only on the Iberian Peninsula.

      What are your ideas for small historical scenarios?

       


       
    • Events - Common events for every civilization in the game
      Hi,
      in this topic, I am interested in your ideas for events that can happen for every Civilization in the game.
      I'm also interested in Missions for every Civilization.

      Here is some example, have more than 10k army, have more than 5000 gold, build 10 buildings, recruit an Advisor, increase tax efficiency 20 times, be largest  producer of some resource in the world, unlock 5 Civilization legacies etc.
      • 196 replies
    • First preview of the Alpha version of Age of History 3
      First preview of the Alpha version of Age of History 3, YouTube.
      Release date: When it's ready 😛 Subscribe for more!



       





       
    • Land units - Ideas AoH3
      AoH3 will have different types of land units.

      In this topic we will write ideas for new land units. 

       

      So the AoH 3 will have new battle system.


      Representation of the battlefield in the game.


      Land units will be grouped into 3 types. Each unit will have a different recruitment cost, attack, defense, movement speed and upkeep.

      Groups determine the placement of units on the battlefield.


       

      Each unit can be unlocked by researching technology and then upgraded.

       

      Here is the current list of units with upgrades:

      First line:

      Warrior -> Light Footmen -> Heavy Infantry -> Infantry -> Line Infantry -> Modern Infantry

      Hoplites -> Spearmen -> Pikeman -> Elite Pikeman -> Musketeer -> Riflemen -> Mechanized Infantry -> Modern Mechanized Infantry

      First line side:

      Horseman -> Elite Horseman -> Cavalry -> Tank -> Modern Tank

      Second line:

      Archer -> Bowmen -> Crossbowman -> Elite Crossbowman

      Canon -> Field Cannon -> Artillery -> Modern Artillery

      Early Airplane -> Airplane -> Modern Airplane

       

      This is a very early version, so maybe something should be changed?

      Or maybe an idea for a new type of unit with upgrades? I'm waiting for your suggestions.

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Age of History Games