suggestion 2 words. Online Multiplayer.

[Fun 58]

Would be fun to have online multiplayer. Many people already really want it, and would up the replayability of the game.

Edited December 28, 2018 by Fun

[Checkmate 142]

Welcome to team fortress 2, after 9 years in development...

[Fun 58]

51 minutes ago, Checkmate said:

Welcome to team fortress 2, after 9 years in development...

Omglol

[Sosumariusz 7]

+1

[Sonicsweden1 55]

9 hours ago, Checkmate said:

Welcome to team fortress 2, after 9 years in development...

...Hopefully, it would've been worth the weight.

 

[enexpi 142]

this need more upvotes

[followstark 71]

Wait a minute..... Sonicsweden1 has 26 posts. 6-2=4 

He has 1 reputation. Add this to the ecuation and we have :  6-2=4-1=3

Half life 3 confirmed

[John Highstone 0]

+1

[Delinard 28]

Having hotseat is a big step,next step is LAN over 2 PCs,if that works then you can setup MP games using hamachi for example.

I guess the final step would be integrating online using steam servers.

[Lativ 89]

I think it's expensive and quite time taking, otherwise Łukasz would certainly add it. Let's just wait for AoC3

[followstark 71]

@Delinard  IT'S ALMOST HARVESTING SEASON!!!!!

[Sonicsweden1 55]

4 minutes ago, Lativ said:

I think it's expensive and quite time taking, otherwise Łukasz would certainly add it. Let's just wait for AoC3

Or we could wait for an update in the future. Keep in mind, FAAAR into the future. Like a year later or something.

[Lativ 89]

1 minute ago, Sonicsweden1 said:

Or we could wait for an update in the future. Keep in mind, FAAAR into the future. Like a year later or something.

True.

[steffan 9]

Yeah but a question, how would it work, do you have a limited time to do your turn? And if you do, then a player can declare war on you in the last 5 seconds and you wouldnt have time to recruit, and if every player has a separate turn, it would take too long for a turn to pass and when you declare war on someone who has already done his turn, it is simply unfair. Please explain

[Selim Pusat 10]

59 minutes ago, steffan said:

Yeah but a question, how would it work, do you have a limited time to do your turn? And if you do, then a player can declare war on you in the last 5 seconds and you wouldnt have time to recruit, and if every player has a separate turn, it would take too long for a turn to pass and when you declare war on someone who has already done his turn, it is simply unfair. Please explain

Thats the point,every single turn take too long to wait. Maybe it can work in small campaign maps like australia ,balkans and ,mid-east so that decisions can be made faster.

[TheFirstHi 16]

7 minutes ago, steffan said:

Yeah but a question, how would it work, do you have a limited time to do your turn? And if you do, then a player can declare war on you in the last 5 seconds and you wouldnt have time to recruit, and if every player has a separate turn, it would take too long for a turn to pass and when you declare war on someone who has already done his turn, it is simply unfair. Please explain

I think it should be like Civ where every human player can take their turn at the same time and you use RNG to determine who's orders get carried out first when the next turn button is hit by all players. 

[Fun 58]

21 minutes ago, TheFirstHi said:

I think it should be like Civ where every human player can take their turn at the same time and you use RNG to determine who's orders get carried out first when the next turn button is hit by all players. 

I agree with that!

[TheCentristGamer 0]

1 hour ago, TheFirstHi said:

I think it should be like Civ where every human player can take their turn at the same time and you use RNG to determine who's orders get carried out first when the next turn button is hit by all players. 

I agree with that too.  And in AOC3 he could make it purely grand strategy and do away with the turn-based system (I have no problem with it, I just don't think it's the best for a multiplayer game).  It's also been confirmed before that AOC3 will have different unit types.  

[Sonicsweden1 55]

1 hour ago, TheFirstHi said:

I think it should be like Civ where every human player can take their turn at the same time and you use RNG to determine who's orders get carried out first when the next turn button is hit by all players. 

I agree with that tho I'm a bit unsure how it will be pulled of with a game like AoCII.

[TheFirstHi 16]

1 hour ago, Sonicsweden1 said:

I agree with that tho I'm a bit unsure how it will be pulled of with a game like AoCII.

I believe the way @Łukasz Jakowski has the game coded, it fits well into the model because whenever you give an order to your army, it loads the order into a queue and then executes them based on either RNG or input order depending on your selection in the options. 

[Delinard 28]

6 hours ago, followstark said:

@Delinard  IT'S ALMOST HARVESTING SEASON!!!!!

Away with you vile beggar.

[enexpi 142]

Civ turn system works fine

If this can happen :kreygasm:

[Hiking1 96]

Just copy Civ online lmao

[Noron 70]

+

[Cristi20404 4]

Can I bring here a nice online multiplayer game to be an example on how the turn ends?